• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床路径相关评估的方法与研究设计综述

Review of methods and study designs of evaluations related to clinical pathways.

作者信息

Lee Xing Ju, Blythe Robin, Choudhury Adnan Ali Khan, Simmons Toni, Graves Nicholas, Kularatna Sanjeewa

机构信息

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovations, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia. Email: ;

Northern Queensland Primary Health Network, James Cook University, Building 500, 1 James Cook Drive, Douglas, Qld 4811, Australia. Email.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):448-456. doi: 10.1071/AH17276.

DOI:10.1071/AH17276
PMID:30089529
Abstract

Objective The HealthPathways program is an online information portal that helps clinicians provide consistent and integrated patient care within a local health system through localised pathways for diagnosis, treatment and management of various health conditions. These pathways are consistent with the definition of clinical pathways. Evaluations of HealthPathways programs have thus far focused primarily on website utilisation and clinical users' experience and satisfaction, with limited evidence on changes to patient outcomes. This lack motivated a literature review of the effects of clinical pathways on patient and economic outcomes to inform a subsequent HealthPathways evaluation. Methods A systematic review was performed to summarise the analytical methods, study designs and results of studies evaluating clinical pathways with an economic outcome component published between 1 January 2000 and 31 August 2017 in four academic literature databases. Results Fifty-five relevant articles were identified for inclusion in this review. The practical pre-post study design with retrospective baseline data extraction and prospective intervention data collection was most commonly used in the evaluations identified. Straightforward statistical methods for comparing outcomes, such as the t-test or χ2 test, were frequently used. Only four of the 55 articles performed a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical pathways were generally associated with improved patient outcomes and positive economic outcomes in hospital settings. Conclusions Clinical pathways evaluations commonly use pragmatic study designs, straightforward statistical tests and cost-consequence analyses. More HealthPathways program evaluations focused on patient and economic outcomes, clinical pathway evaluations in a primary care setting and cost-effectiveness analyses of clinical pathways are needed. What is known about the topic? HealthPathways is a web-based program that originated from Canterbury, New Zealand, and has seen uptake elsewhere in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. The HealthPathways program aims to assist the provision of consistent and integrated health services through dedicated, localised pathways for various health conditions specific to the health region. Evaluations of HealthPathways program focused on patient and economic outcomes have been limited. What does this paper add? This review synthesises the academic literature of clinical pathways evaluations in order to inform a subsequent HealthPathways evaluation. The focus of the synthesis was on the analytical methods and study designs used in the previous evaluations. The previous clinical pathway evaluations have been pragmatic in nature with relatively straightforward study designs and analysis. What are the implications for practitioners? There is a need for more economic and patient outcome evaluations for HealthPathways programs. More sophisticated statistical analyses and economic evaluations could add value to these evaluations, where appropriate and taking into consideration the data limitations.

摘要

目的 “健康路径”计划是一个在线信息门户,它通过针对各种健康状况的本地化诊断、治疗和管理路径,帮助临床医生在当地卫生系统内提供一致且综合的患者护理。这些路径与临床路径的定义一致。迄今为止,对“健康路径”计划的评估主要集中在网站使用情况以及临床用户的体验和满意度上,关于患者结局变化的证据有限。这种情况促使我们对临床路径对患者和经济结局的影响进行文献综述,以为后续的“健康路径”评估提供参考。方法 进行了一项系统综述,以总结2000年1月1日至2017年8月31日期间在四个学术文献数据库中发表的、评估包含经济结局成分的临床路径的研究的分析方法、研究设计和结果。结果 共确定了55篇相关文章纳入本综述。在已确定的评估中,最常用的是带有回顾性基线数据提取和前瞻性干预数据收集的实用前后对照研究设计。经常使用简单的统计方法来比较结局,如t检验或χ²检验。55篇文章中只有4篇进行了成本效益分析。在医院环境中,临床路径通常与改善患者结局和产生积极的经济结局相关。结论 临床路径评估通常采用实用的研究设计、简单的统计检验和成本后果分析。需要更多关注患者和经济结局的“健康路径”计划评估、初级保健环境中的临床路径评估以及临床路径的成本效益分析。关于该主题已知的信息是什么?“健康路径”是一个基于网络的计划,起源于新西兰坎特伯雷,已在新西兰其他地区、澳大利亚和英国得到应用。“健康路径”计划旨在通过针对特定健康区域各种健康状况的专门本地化路径,协助提供一致且综合的卫生服务。对“健康路径”计划侧重于患者和经济结局的评估一直很有限。本文补充了什么内容?本综述综合了临床路径评估的学术文献,以为后续的“健康路径”评估提供参考。综述的重点是先前评估中使用的分析方法和研究设计。先前的临床路径评估本质上较为实用,研究设计和分析相对简单。对从业者有何启示?需要对“健康路径”计划进行更多的经济和患者结局评估。在适当的情况下并考虑到数据限制,更复杂的统计分析和经济评估可为这些评估增添价值。

相似文献

1
Review of methods and study designs of evaluations related to clinical pathways.临床路径相关评估的方法与研究设计综述
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):448-456. doi: 10.1071/AH17276.
2
Hunter and New England HealthPathways: a 4-year journey of integrated care.亨特与新英格兰健康路径:四年的综合医疗历程。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):66-71. doi: 10.1071/AH16197.
3
Evaluation of HealthPathways: an appraisal of usage, experiences and opinions of healthcare professionals in Australia and New Zealand.评估健康路径:澳大利亚和新西兰医疗保健专业人员的使用情况、经验和意见评价。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Aug;44(4):590-600. doi: 10.1071/AH19214.
4
Impact and outcome evaluation of HealthPathways: a scoping review of published methodologies.健康路径的影响和结果评估:已发表方法的范围综述。
J Prim Health Care. 2021 Sep;13(3):260-273. doi: 10.1071/HC21067.
5
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
6
On the right path? Exploring the experiences and opinions of clinicians involved in developing and implementing HealthPathways Barwon.走在正确的道路上?探索参与开发和实施巴旺健康路径的临床医生的经验和观点。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Apr;40(2):129-135. doi: 10.1071/AH15009.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
HealthPathways implementation in a New Zealand health region: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.新西兰卫生区域内的 HealthPathways 实施:使用实施研究综合框架的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 31;8(12):e025094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025094.
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicians' Experiences and Perspectives about a New Lung Cancer Referral Pathway in a Regional Health Service.临床医生对某地区卫生服务机构中一种新的肺癌转诊途径的经验与看法。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Apr 4;24(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7627. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
2
Patient experiences and perspectives of health service access for carpal tunnel syndrome in Aotearoa New Zealand: a normalisation process theory-informed qualitative study.新西兰奥塔哥地区腕管综合征患者获取医疗服务的体验和看法:基于常态过程理论的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10871-x.
3
Cardiac interventions in Wales: A comparison of benefits between NHS Wales specialties.
威尔士的心脏介入治疗:NHS 威尔士各专业之间的效益比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0297049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297049. eCollection 2024.
4
Economic Analysis of Specialist Referral Patterns in Mackay, Queensland Following HealthPathways Implementation.昆士兰州麦凯实施健康路径后专家转诊模式的经济分析。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211041489. doi: 10.1177/21501327211041489.