Lee Xing Ju, Blythe Robin, Choudhury Adnan Ali Khan, Simmons Toni, Graves Nicholas, Kularatna Sanjeewa
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovations, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia. Email: ;
Northern Queensland Primary Health Network, James Cook University, Building 500, 1 James Cook Drive, Douglas, Qld 4811, Australia. Email.
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):448-456. doi: 10.1071/AH17276.
Objective The HealthPathways program is an online information portal that helps clinicians provide consistent and integrated patient care within a local health system through localised pathways for diagnosis, treatment and management of various health conditions. These pathways are consistent with the definition of clinical pathways. Evaluations of HealthPathways programs have thus far focused primarily on website utilisation and clinical users' experience and satisfaction, with limited evidence on changes to patient outcomes. This lack motivated a literature review of the effects of clinical pathways on patient and economic outcomes to inform a subsequent HealthPathways evaluation. Methods A systematic review was performed to summarise the analytical methods, study designs and results of studies evaluating clinical pathways with an economic outcome component published between 1 January 2000 and 31 August 2017 in four academic literature databases. Results Fifty-five relevant articles were identified for inclusion in this review. The practical pre-post study design with retrospective baseline data extraction and prospective intervention data collection was most commonly used in the evaluations identified. Straightforward statistical methods for comparing outcomes, such as the t-test or χ2 test, were frequently used. Only four of the 55 articles performed a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical pathways were generally associated with improved patient outcomes and positive economic outcomes in hospital settings. Conclusions Clinical pathways evaluations commonly use pragmatic study designs, straightforward statistical tests and cost-consequence analyses. More HealthPathways program evaluations focused on patient and economic outcomes, clinical pathway evaluations in a primary care setting and cost-effectiveness analyses of clinical pathways are needed. What is known about the topic? HealthPathways is a web-based program that originated from Canterbury, New Zealand, and has seen uptake elsewhere in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. The HealthPathways program aims to assist the provision of consistent and integrated health services through dedicated, localised pathways for various health conditions specific to the health region. Evaluations of HealthPathways program focused on patient and economic outcomes have been limited. What does this paper add? This review synthesises the academic literature of clinical pathways evaluations in order to inform a subsequent HealthPathways evaluation. The focus of the synthesis was on the analytical methods and study designs used in the previous evaluations. The previous clinical pathway evaluations have been pragmatic in nature with relatively straightforward study designs and analysis. What are the implications for practitioners? There is a need for more economic and patient outcome evaluations for HealthPathways programs. More sophisticated statistical analyses and economic evaluations could add value to these evaluations, where appropriate and taking into consideration the data limitations.
目的 “健康路径”计划是一个在线信息门户,它通过针对各种健康状况的本地化诊断、治疗和管理路径,帮助临床医生在当地卫生系统内提供一致且综合的患者护理。这些路径与临床路径的定义一致。迄今为止,对“健康路径”计划的评估主要集中在网站使用情况以及临床用户的体验和满意度上,关于患者结局变化的证据有限。这种情况促使我们对临床路径对患者和经济结局的影响进行文献综述,以为后续的“健康路径”评估提供参考。方法 进行了一项系统综述,以总结2000年1月1日至2017年8月31日期间在四个学术文献数据库中发表的、评估包含经济结局成分的临床路径的研究的分析方法、研究设计和结果。结果 共确定了55篇相关文章纳入本综述。在已确定的评估中,最常用的是带有回顾性基线数据提取和前瞻性干预数据收集的实用前后对照研究设计。经常使用简单的统计方法来比较结局,如t检验或χ²检验。55篇文章中只有4篇进行了成本效益分析。在医院环境中,临床路径通常与改善患者结局和产生积极的经济结局相关。结论 临床路径评估通常采用实用的研究设计、简单的统计检验和成本后果分析。需要更多关注患者和经济结局的“健康路径”计划评估、初级保健环境中的临床路径评估以及临床路径的成本效益分析。关于该主题已知的信息是什么?“健康路径”是一个基于网络的计划,起源于新西兰坎特伯雷,已在新西兰其他地区、澳大利亚和英国得到应用。“健康路径”计划旨在通过针对特定健康区域各种健康状况的专门本地化路径,协助提供一致且综合的卫生服务。对“健康路径”计划侧重于患者和经济结局的评估一直很有限。本文补充了什么内容?本综述综合了临床路径评估的学术文献,以为后续的“健康路径”评估提供参考。综述的重点是先前评估中使用的分析方法和研究设计。先前的临床路径评估本质上较为实用,研究设计和分析相对简单。对从业者有何启示?需要对“健康路径”计划进行更多的经济和患者结局评估。在适当的情况下并考虑到数据限制,更复杂的统计分析和经济评估可为这些评估增添价值。