• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威尔士的心脏介入治疗:NHS 威尔士各专业之间的效益比较。

Cardiac interventions in Wales: A comparison of benefits between NHS Wales specialties.

机构信息

Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales.

NHS Wales Executive, Wales Cardiovascular Network, Cardiff, Wales.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0297049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297049. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0297049
PMID:38335178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10857708/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to assess if specialised healthcare service interventions in Wales benefit the population equitably in work commissioned by the Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee (WHSSC).

APPROACH

The study utilised anonymised individual-level, population-scale, routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank to identify patients resident in Wales receiving specialist cardiac interventions. Measurement was undertaken of associated patient outcomes 2-years before and after the intervention (minus a 6-month clearance period on either side) by measuring events in primary care, hospital attendance, outpatient and emergency department. The analysis controlled for comorbidity (Charlson) and deprivation (Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation), stratified by admission type (elective or emergency) and membership of top 5% post-intervention costs. Costs were estimated by multiplying events by mean person cost estimates.

RESULTS

We identified 5,999 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and 1,640 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) between 2014-06-01 to 2020-02-29. The ratio of emergency to elective interventions was 2.85 for PCI and 1.04 for CABG. In multivariate analysis significant associations were identified for comorbidity (OR = 1.52, CI = (1.01-2.27)), deprivation (OR = 1.34, CI = (1.03-1.76)) and rurality (OR = 0.81, CI = (0.70-0.95)) for PCI interventions, and comorbidity (OR = 1.47, CI = (1.10-1.98)) for CABG. Higher costs post-intervention were associated with increased comorbidity for PCI and CABG in the top 5% cost groups, but for PCI this was not seen outside the top 5%. For PCI, moderate cost increase was associated with increased deprivation, but the picture was more mixed following CABG interventions. For both interventions, lower costs post intervention were seen in rural locations.

CONCLUSION

We identified and compared health outcomes for selected specialist cardiac interventions amongst patients resident in Wales, with these methods and analyses, providing a template for comparing other cardiac interventions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估威尔士的专业医疗保健服务干预措施是否使该地区的人群在威尔士卫生专门服务委员会(WHSSC)委托的工作中受益公平。

方法

本研究利用匿名的、基于人群的、常规收集的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,这些数据保存在安全匿名信息链接(SAIL)数据库中,以确定居住在威尔士的接受心脏专科干预的患者。通过测量初级保健、医院就诊、门诊和急诊部门的事件,在干预前 2 年和干预后(每侧 6 个月的清除期除外)对相关患者结果进行了测量。分析通过控制合并症(Charlson)和贫困(威尔士多重剥夺指数),并按入院类型(选择性或紧急性)和干预后前 5%的成本会员资格进行分层,对事件进行了控制。通过将事件乘以人均成本估算值来估算成本。

结果

我们确定了 2014 年 6 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日期间的 5999 例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和 1640 例冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。PCI 的急诊与择期干预之比为 2.85,CABG 的急诊与择期干预之比为 1.04。多变量分析确定了 PCI 干预的合并症(OR = 1.52,CI =(1.01-2.27))、贫困(OR = 1.34,CI =(1.03-1.76))和农村地区(OR = 0.81,CI =(0.70-0.95))之间存在显著关联,CABG 的合并症(OR = 1.47,CI =(1.10-1.98))。在 PCI 和 CABG 的前 5%成本组中,较高的术后并发症与较高的术后并发症相关,但在 PCI 中,在 5%以上则没有发现这种情况。对于 PCI,较高的术后并发症与较高的贫困相关,但 CABG 干预后的情况更为复杂。对于两种干预措施,农村地区的术后成本较低。

结论

我们使用这些方法和分析,确定并比较了居住在威尔士的患者接受选定的心脏专科干预后的健康结果,为比较其他心脏干预措施提供了模板。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/a13cb217189e/pone.0297049.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/0b32f7bb7d58/pone.0297049.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/97b875a2c2a6/pone.0297049.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/78aaa866c800/pone.0297049.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/3d89516f0d5e/pone.0297049.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/1b7808885b19/pone.0297049.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/f549150b3a80/pone.0297049.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/e1dc8142bf33/pone.0297049.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/d85e25a1630c/pone.0297049.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/2700bd90c634/pone.0297049.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/a13cb217189e/pone.0297049.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/0b32f7bb7d58/pone.0297049.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/97b875a2c2a6/pone.0297049.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/78aaa866c800/pone.0297049.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/3d89516f0d5e/pone.0297049.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/1b7808885b19/pone.0297049.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/f549150b3a80/pone.0297049.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/e1dc8142bf33/pone.0297049.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/d85e25a1630c/pone.0297049.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/2700bd90c634/pone.0297049.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd42/10857708/a13cb217189e/pone.0297049.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac interventions in Wales: A comparison of benefits between NHS Wales specialties.威尔士的心脏介入治疗:NHS 威尔士各专业之间的效益比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0297049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297049. eCollection 2024.
2
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
3
Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的结局。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006824. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006824.
4
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
The effect of lifestyle modification on depression among myocardial infarction patients after revascularisation.生活方式改变对经血运重建的心肌梗死患者抑郁的影响。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021;32(2):70-77. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-030. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.58870 例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中血管入路部位和结局的研究:来自英国心血管介入学会国家数据库的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):482-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.12.020.
7
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease compared to coronary artery bypass surgery five-years after intervention.与冠状动脉搭桥手术相比,药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者术后五年的成本效益。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec 1;84(7):1029-39. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25397. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
9
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.从荷兰视角看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与搭桥手术的成本效益
Heart. 2015 Dec;101(24):1980-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307578. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
10
Impact of target vessel choice on outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a prior coronary artery bypass graft.既往有冠状动脉旁路移植术患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中靶血管选择对预后的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):E785-E795. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29935. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on community medication dispensing: a national cohort analysis in Wales, UK.新冠疫情对社区药物配发的影响:英国威尔士的全国队列分析。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Apr 28;5(4):1715. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1715. eCollection 2020.
2
Validating the QCOVID risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in the adult population in Wales, UK.验证 QCOVID 风险预测算法在英国威尔士成年人群中 COVID-19 死亡率风险的预测能力。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Feb 15;5(4):1697. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1697. eCollection 2020.
3
Calculating real-world travel routes instead of straight-line distance in the community response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
在社区对院外心脏骤停的应对中计算实际出行路线而非直线距离。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Nov 9;8:100176. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100176. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Does public long-term care expenditure improve care-related quality of life of service users in England?在英格兰,公共长期护理支出是否能提高服务使用者的与护理相关的生活质量?
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(10):2561-2581. doi: 10.1002/hec.4396. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Socio-Economic Deprivation and Symptom Burden in UK Hospice Patients with Advanced Cancer-Findings from a Longitudinal Study.英国晚期癌症临终关怀患者的社会经济剥夺与症状负担——一项纵向研究的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 21;13(11):2537. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112537.
6
Protocol for the development of the Wales Multimorbidity e-Cohort (WMC): data sources and methods to construct a population-based research platform to investigate multimorbidity.威尔士多病种电子队列研究方案(WMC)制定协议:构建基于人群的多病种研究平台以调查多病种的数据源和方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):e047101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047101.
7
Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Realist Synthesis.初级保健中频繁使用医疗服务人群的病例管理:一个现实主义综合研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):218-226. doi: 10.1370/afm.2499.
8
Identifying alternative models of healthcare service delivery to inform health system improvement: scoping review of systematic reviews.确定替代医疗服务提供模式以促进卫生系统改善:系统评价的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e036112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036112.
9
Impact of care provider network characteristics on patient outcomes: Usage of social network analysis and a multi-scale community detection.医疗服务提供者网络特征对患者结局的影响:社会网络分析和多尺度社区检测的应用。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 9;14(9):e0222016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222016. eCollection 2019.
10
Review of methods and study designs of evaluations related to clinical pathways.临床路径相关评估的方法与研究设计综述
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):448-456. doi: 10.1071/AH17276.