University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2019 Nov;29(13):1942-1953. doi: 10.1177/1049732318791826. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Do members of the public believe that biobanks should accommodate the moral concerns of donors about the types of research done with their biospecimens? The answer to this question is critical to the future of genomic and precision medicine, endeavors that rely on a public willing to share their biospecimens and medical data. To explore public attitudes regarding the requirements of consent for biobank donations, we organized three democratic deliberations involving 180 participants. The deliberative sessions involved small group discussions informed by presentations given by experts in both biobank research and ethics. We found that participants had a sophisticated understanding of the ethical problems of biobank consent and the complexity of balancing donor concerns while promoting research important to the future of health care. Our research shows how deliberative methods can offer policy makers creative ideas for accommodating the moral concerns of donors in the biobank consent process.
公众是否认为生物银行应该考虑到捐赠者对其生物样本进行研究的道德关切?这个问题的答案对于基因组学和精准医学的未来至关重要,这些领域依赖于公众愿意分享他们的生物样本和医疗数据。为了探索公众对生物库捐赠同意要求的态度,我们组织了三次涉及 180 名参与者的民主讨论。这些讨论涉及到小组讨论,讨论内容是由生物库研究和伦理学方面的专家介绍的。我们发现,参与者对生物库同意的伦理问题以及平衡捐赠者的关注与促进对未来医疗保健重要的研究之间的复杂性有了深刻的理解。我们的研究表明,协商方法如何为政策制定者提供有创意的想法,以在生物库同意过程中考虑到捐赠者的道德关切。