Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1535-1545. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac084.
Participation in healthcare research shapes health policy and practice; however, low trust is a barrier to participation. We evaluated whether returning health information (information transparency) and disclosing intent of data use (intent transparency) impacts trust in research.
We conducted an online survey with a representative sample of 502 US adults. We assessed baseline trust and change in trust using 6 use cases representing the Social-Ecological Model. We assessed descriptive statistics and associations between trust and sociodemographic variables using logistic and multinomial regression.
Most participants (84%) want their health research information returned. Black/African American participants were more likely to increase trust in research with individual information transparency (odds ratio (OR) 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-4.34]) and with intent transparency when sharing with chosen friends and family (3.66 [1.98-6.77]), doctors and nurses (1.96 [1.10-3.65]), or health tech companies (1.87 [1.02-3.40]). Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Multirace, and individuals with a race not listed, were more likely to increase trust when sharing with health policy makers (1.88 [1.09-3.30]). Women were less likely to increase trust when sharing with friends and family (0.55 [0.35-0.87]) or health tech companies (0.46 [0.31-0.70]).
Participants wanted their health information returned and would increase their trust in research with transparency when sharing health information.
Trust in research is influenced by interrelated factors. Future research should recruit diverse samples with lower baseline trust levels to explore changes in trust, with variation on the type of information shared.
参与医疗保健研究影响卫生政策和实践;然而,低信任是参与的障碍。我们评估了返还健康信息(信息透明度)和披露数据使用意图(意图透明度)是否会影响对研究的信任。
我们对 502 名美国成年人进行了一项在线调查,代表样本。我们使用代表社会生态模型的 6 个用例评估了信任的基线和变化。我们使用逻辑回归和多项回归评估了信任与社会人口变量之间的描述性统计和关联。
大多数参与者(84%)希望返还他们的健康研究信息。黑人和非洲裔美国人更有可能增加个人信息透明度(优势比(OR)2.06 [95%置信区间(CI):1.06-4.34])和在与选定的朋友和家人(3.66 [1.98-6.77])、医生和护士(1.96 [1.10-3.65])或医疗技术公司(1.87 [1.02-3.40])分享时的意图透明度。亚洲人、美国原住民或阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民、多种族和未列出种族的人更有可能在与卫生政策制定者分享时增加信任(1.88 [1.09-3.30])。女性更有可能在与朋友和家人(0.55 [0.35-0.87])或医疗技术公司(0.46 [0.31-0.70])分享时降低信任。
参与者希望返还他们的健康信息,并在分享健康信息时提高透明度,从而提高对研究的信任。
对研究的信任受到相互关联的因素的影响。未来的研究应该招募信任水平较低的不同样本,以探索信任的变化,并对分享的信息类型进行多样化。