• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults.通过健康信息的信息和意图透明度建立对研究的信任:对 502 名美国成年人的代表性横断面调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1535-1545. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac084.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.研究参与者的研究结果返还:数据访问、格式和共享偏好。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Tobacco Information Seeking and Information Sources: Findings From the 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey.烟草信息获取与信息来源的种族和民族差异:2015年健康信息国家趋势调查结果
J Health Commun. 2017 Sep;22(9):743-752. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1347216. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
5
Americans' Trust in Health Information Sources: Trends and Sociodemographic Predictors.美国人对健康信息来源的信任:趋势与社会人口统计学预测因素
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Nov;33(8):1187-1193. doi: 10.1177/0890117119861280. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂重建手术中的种族和民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):405.e1-405.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.用于健康研究的医学数据共享:早期个人健康记录经验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 25;12(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1356.
8
Odds of talking to healthcare providers as the initial source of healthcare information: updated cross-sectional results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).作为医疗保健信息的最初来源与医疗服务提供者交谈的几率:来自健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的最新横断面结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Aug 29;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0805-7.
9
Whom do older adults trust most to provide information about prescription drugs?老年人最信任谁来提供有关处方药的信息?
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.005.
10
Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong.将社交媒体作为健康信息来源的信任度:比较美国、韩国和中国香港地区的在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 14;18(3):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4193.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.整合公众偏好以克服研究中的种族差异:一项关于增强对研究数据共享实践信任度的美国调查结果
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data.研究参与者对他们在“增强参与者声音:成果与可操作数据”中的研究经历有何看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 10;9(1):e43. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.3. eCollection 2025.
3
Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy.公众对 2023 年美国国立卫生研究院数据共享政策背景下增加健康研究数据共享的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0309161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309161. eCollection 2024.
4
Improving diversity in cardiac surgery clinical trials with ROMA:Women as an exemplar.利用 ROMA 提高心脏外科学临床试验的多样性:以女性为例。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;39(5):426-430. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001162. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
Health literacy, numeracy, graph literacy, and digital literacy: an overview of definitions, evaluation methods, and best practices.健康素养、计算素养、图形素养和数字素养:定义、评估方法和最佳实践概述。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 May 28;23(4):423-428. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad085.
6
Perceptions of patient-reported outcome data access and sharing among patients with heart failure: ethical implications for research.心力衰竭患者对患者报告结局数据获取和共享的看法:对研究的伦理影响。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 Mar 12;23(2):145-151. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad046.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Patient Trust in Hospitals: A Combination of Hospital-Related Factors and Health Care Clinician Behaviors.建立患者对医院的信任:医院相关因素与医疗保健临床医生行为的结合。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Dec;47(12):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
2
Considering "Respect for Sovereignty" Beyond the Belmont Report and the Common Rule: Ethical and Legal Implications for American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples.超越《贝尔蒙报告》和《联邦法规法典》中“共同规则”来考量“尊重主权”:对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的伦理与法律影响
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Oct;21(10):27-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1968068.
3
Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals.医学与科学期刊中种族与民族报告的更新指南。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13304.
4
Uptake of and Engagement With an Online Sexual Health Intervention (HOPE eIntervention) Among African American Young Adults: Mixed Methods Study.一项针对非裔美国年轻成年人的在线性健康干预措施(HOPE eIntervention)的接受和参与情况的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 16;23(7):e22203. doi: 10.2196/22203.
5
Everyone should decide how their digital data are used - not just tech companies.每个人都应该决定自己的数字数据如何被使用——而不仅仅是科技公司。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):169-171. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01812-3.
6
Informatics-enabled citizen science to advance health equity.信息学支持的公民科学促进健康公平。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):2009-2012. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab088.
7
Consumer Views on Using Digital Data for COVID-19 Control in the United States.消费者对美国使用数字数据进行新冠疫情控制的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10918.
8
Understanding of Physical Activity in Social Ecological Perspective: Application of Multilevel Model.从社会生态视角理解身体活动:多层次模型的应用
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 5;12:622929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622929. eCollection 2021.
9
Beyond Tuskegee - Vaccine Distrust and Everyday Racism.超越塔斯基吉事件——疫苗不信任与日常种族主义
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):e12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMpv2035827. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
10
Health Disparities Research with American Indian Communities: The Importance of Trust and Transparency.美国印第安人社区的健康差异研究:信任和透明度的重要性。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Dec;66(3-4):302-313. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12445. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

通过健康信息的信息和意图透明度建立对研究的信任:对 502 名美国成年人的代表性横断面调查。

Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1535-1545. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac084.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocac084
PMID:35699571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382374/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Participation in healthcare research shapes health policy and practice; however, low trust is a barrier to participation. We evaluated whether returning health information (information transparency) and disclosing intent of data use (intent transparency) impacts trust in research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an online survey with a representative sample of 502 US adults. We assessed baseline trust and change in trust using 6 use cases representing the Social-Ecological Model. We assessed descriptive statistics and associations between trust and sociodemographic variables using logistic and multinomial regression.

RESULTS

Most participants (84%) want their health research information returned. Black/African American participants were more likely to increase trust in research with individual information transparency (odds ratio (OR) 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-4.34]) and with intent transparency when sharing with chosen friends and family (3.66 [1.98-6.77]), doctors and nurses (1.96 [1.10-3.65]), or health tech companies (1.87 [1.02-3.40]). Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Multirace, and individuals with a race not listed, were more likely to increase trust when sharing with health policy makers (1.88 [1.09-3.30]). Women were less likely to increase trust when sharing with friends and family (0.55 [0.35-0.87]) or health tech companies (0.46 [0.31-0.70]).

DISCUSSION

Participants wanted their health information returned and would increase their trust in research with transparency when sharing health information.

CONCLUSION

Trust in research is influenced by interrelated factors. Future research should recruit diverse samples with lower baseline trust levels to explore changes in trust, with variation on the type of information shared.

摘要

目的

参与医疗保健研究影响卫生政策和实践;然而,低信任是参与的障碍。我们评估了返还健康信息(信息透明度)和披露数据使用意图(意图透明度)是否会影响对研究的信任。

材料和方法

我们对 502 名美国成年人进行了一项在线调查,代表样本。我们使用代表社会生态模型的 6 个用例评估了信任的基线和变化。我们使用逻辑回归和多项回归评估了信任与社会人口变量之间的描述性统计和关联。

结果

大多数参与者(84%)希望返还他们的健康研究信息。黑人和非洲裔美国人更有可能增加个人信息透明度(优势比(OR)2.06 [95%置信区间(CI):1.06-4.34])和在与选定的朋友和家人(3.66 [1.98-6.77])、医生和护士(1.96 [1.10-3.65])或医疗技术公司(1.87 [1.02-3.40])分享时的意图透明度。亚洲人、美国原住民或阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民、多种族和未列出种族的人更有可能在与卫生政策制定者分享时增加信任(1.88 [1.09-3.30])。女性更有可能在与朋友和家人(0.55 [0.35-0.87])或医疗技术公司(0.46 [0.31-0.70])分享时降低信任。

讨论

参与者希望返还他们的健康信息,并在分享健康信息时提高透明度,从而提高对研究的信任。

结论

对研究的信任受到相互关联的因素的影响。未来的研究应该招募信任水平较低的不同样本,以探索信任的变化,并对分享的信息类型进行多样化。