Tenzel P L, Williams Z F, McCarthy R A, Hope W W
Department of Surgery, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, 2131 South 17th Street, PO Box 9025, Wilmington, NC, 28401, USA.
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):781-784. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1801-5. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Given the difficulty of durable repairs, there is continued interest in hernia prevention. One emerging prevention technique for parastomal hernias is prophylactic mesh placement, whereby mesh is inserted during the index procedure as hernia prophylaxis. We evaluated our experience using prophylactic mesh when creating an ileal conduit.
We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing robotic cystectomy with ileal conduit from 6/2010 to 8/2017. Patient demographics and operative/perioperative outcomes were documented. We evaluated hernia recurrence using postoperative computed tomography scanning or physical exam. Prophylactic mesh was inserted at the operating surgeon's discretion using a synthetic resorbable or biologic mesh.
During the study period, 38 patients underwent robotic-assisted cystectomy with ileal conduit formation. Average patient age was 68 years, with 28 (74%) male and 35 (92%) Caucasian patients. Three patients (8%) required conversion to open, and one patient (3%) had a concomitant colorectal resection. Thirty-one (88%) patients had postoperative computed tomography scanning. Prophylactic mesh was used in 18 patients (47%) in a retrorectus position. Of these, 15 (83%) patients had synthetic resorbable mesh and 3 (17%) patients had biologic mesh. At average follow-up of 21 months, one hernia recurred (5%) in a patient without mesh placement at the time of ileal conduit. At an average follow-up of 11 months, there have been no recurrences and no mesh-related complications in the prophylactic mesh group.
Using prophylactic mesh in ileal conduit, creation is feasible and may decrease the parastomal hernia formation rate. Further study of using synthetic resorbable and biologic meshes for hernia prophylaxis is warranted.
鉴于持久修复的困难,人们对疝气预防仍持续关注。一种新兴的造口旁疝预防技术是预防性置入补片,即在初次手术过程中置入补片以预防疝气。我们评估了在创建回肠导管时使用预防性补片的经验。
我们回顾性分析了2010年6月至2017年8月期间接受机器人辅助膀胱切除术并创建回肠导管的患者。记录患者的人口统计学资料以及手术/围手术期结果。我们通过术后计算机断层扫描或体格检查评估疝气复发情况。预防性补片由手术医生酌情决定使用合成可吸收补片或生物补片置入。
在研究期间,38例患者接受了机器人辅助膀胱切除术并形成回肠导管。患者平均年龄为68岁,其中28例(74%)为男性,35例(92%)为白种人。3例患者(8%)需要转为开放手术,1例患者(3%)同时进行了结直肠切除术。31例(88%)患者进行了术后计算机断层扫描。18例患者(47%)在直肠后间隙使用了预防性补片。其中,15例(83%)患者使用了合成可吸收补片,3例(17%)患者使用了生物补片。平均随访21个月时,1例在创建回肠导管时未置入补片的患者出现疝气复发(5%)。在预防性补片组,平均随访11个月时,未出现复发情况,也没有与补片相关的并发症。
在回肠导管创建中使用预防性补片是可行的,且可能降低造口旁疝的形成率。有必要进一步研究使用合成可吸收补片和生物补片预防疝气的情况。