Jin Liling
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100080, China.
Brain Cogn. 2018 Oct;126:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
A key issue in the area of language processing is the mechanism underlying the processing of animacy information during sentence comprehension. In this ERP study, we investigated the temporal dynamics of animacy processing in Korean noun-classifier combinations that do not involve verb-noun thematic processing. We manipulated semantic and animacy relationships between nouns and their following classifiers, and there were three conditions in our experiment: (a) correct, (b) semantic mismatch, or (c) animacy mismatch. The results showed that both noun-classifier mismatch conditions evoked a biphasic N400-P600 effect, but there was no P600 difference between the two mismatch conditions. However, further analyses indicated that the animacy mismatch condition evoked a less negative-going waveform than the semantic mismatch condition in the 400-500 ms time window. Our findings suggest that the brain processes animacy information differently from other semantic features in noun-classifier combinations in Korean, and additional animacy mismatch blocked further fine-grained semantic processing. The ERP evidence also suggests that the role of animacy in sentence comprehension varies according to language type and sentence structure. Whether animacy participates in the construction of verb-noun thematic relationships in sentences may be an important factor that influences the neural patterns of animacy processing in language comprehension.
语言处理领域的一个关键问题是句子理解过程中生命性信息处理的潜在机制。在这项事件相关电位(ERP)研究中,我们调查了韩语名词-量词组合中不涉及动词-名词主题处理的生命性处理的时间动态。我们操纵了名词与其后的量词之间的语义和生命性关系,实验中有三种条件:(a)正确,(b)语义不匹配,或(c)生命性不匹配。结果表明,名词-量词不匹配的两种条件都引发了双相的N400-P600效应,但两种不匹配条件之间没有P600差异。然而,进一步分析表明,在400-500毫秒的时间窗口内,生命性不匹配条件引发的负向波比语义不匹配条件下的要小。我们的研究结果表明,在韩语名词-量词组合中,大脑对生命性信息的处理方式与其他语义特征不同,额外的生命性不匹配会阻碍进一步的细粒度语义处理。ERP证据还表明,生命性在句子理解中的作用因语言类型和句子结构而异。生命性是否参与句子中动词-名词主题关系的构建可能是影响语言理解中生命性处理神经模式的一个重要因素。