Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Amsterdam, VUmc MS Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Amsterdam, VUmc MS Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;90(1):44-46. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318261. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
To test the current progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) diagnostic criteria by applying them to patients previously diagnosed with natalizumab (NTZ)-associated PML in a real-world clinical setting.
Patients from the Dutch-Belgian NTZ-PML cohort (n=28) were reviewed at the time of first diagnostic work-up and during follow-up, using the PML diagnostic criteria as proposed in a consensus statement from the American Academy of Neurology.
At first diagnostic work-up, 18 patients (64.3%) met the criteria for high diagnostic certainty for PML ('definite PML' or 'probable PML'). During follow-up, this increased to 20 patients (71.4%) as JC virus DNA was detected in cerebrospinal fluid of two additional patients. Nonetheless, 28.6% of patients were still classified as 'possible PML' or 'not PML' (6 (21.5%) and 2 (7.1%) patients, respectively) despite a very high suspicion for PML based on lesion evolution and signs of PML-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome on MRI, and development of compatible symptoms.
The current case definition of PML has low sensitivity for diagnosis of NTZ-PML in a real-world clinical setting in which MRI is frequently used for PML screening. This may delay diagnosis and appropriate management of PML, and may complicate a valid estimation of PML incidence during NTZ therapy.
通过将其应用于先前在真实临床环境中诊断为纳武单抗(NTZ)相关性进行性多灶性脑白质病(PML)的患者,来检验当前 PML 的诊断标准。
在首次诊断性检查和随访期间,使用美国神经病学学会共识声明中提出的 PML 诊断标准,对荷兰-比利时 NTZ-PML 队列中的 28 名患者进行了回顾。
在首次诊断性检查时,18 名患者(64.3%)符合 PML 的高诊断确定性标准(“明确 PML”或“可能 PML”)。在随访期间,由于另外两名患者的脑脊液中检测到 JC 病毒 DNA,这一比例增加到 20 名患者(71.4%)。尽管基于病变演变和 MRI 上 PML 免疫重建炎症综合征的迹象以及出现相符的症状,高度怀疑 PML,但仍有 28.6%的患者被归类为“可能 PML”或“非 PML”(分别为 6 名(21.5%)和 2 名(7.1%)患者)。
在 MRI 常用于 PML 筛查的真实临床环境中,当前的 PML 病例定义对 NTZ-PML 的诊断敏感性较低。这可能会延迟 PML 的诊断和适当管理,并可能使 NTZ 治疗期间 PML 发病率的有效估计复杂化。