• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对面孔的快速遗忘

The Rapid Forgetting of Faces.

作者信息

Krill Dana, Avidan Galia, Pertzov Yoni

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 27;9:1319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01319. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01319
PMID:30100894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6074000/
Abstract

How are faces forgotten? Studies examining forgetting in visual working memory (VWM) typically use simple visual features; however, in ecological scenarios, VWM typically contains complex objects. Given their significance in everyday functioning and their visual complexity, here we investigated how upright and inverted faces are forgotten within a few seconds, focusing on the raw errors that accompany such forgetting and examining their characteristics. In three experiments we found that longer retention intervals increased the size of errors. This effect was mainly accounted for by a larger proportion of random errors - suggesting that forgetting of faces reflects decreased accessibility of the memory representations over time. On the other hand, longer retention intervals did not modulate the precision of recall - suggesting that forgetting does not affect the precision of accessible memory representation. Thus, when upright and inverted faces are forgotten there is a complete failure to access them or a complete collapse of their memory representation. In contrast to the effect of retention interval (i.e., forgetting), face inversion led to larger errors that were mainly associated with decreased precision of recall. This effect was not modulated by the duration of the retention interval, and was observed even when memory was not required in the task. Therefore, upright faces are remembered more precisely compared to inverted ones due to perceptual, rather than mnemonic processes.

摘要

面孔是如何被遗忘的?研究视觉工作记忆(VWM)中的遗忘现象的实验通常使用简单的视觉特征;然而,在现实场景中,VWM通常包含复杂的物体。鉴于面孔在日常功能中的重要性及其视觉复杂性,我们在此研究了直立和倒置的面孔在几秒钟内是如何被遗忘的,重点关注伴随这种遗忘出现的原始错误并考察其特征。在三个实验中,我们发现更长的保持间隔会增加错误的大小。这种效应主要是由更大比例的随机错误导致的——这表明面孔的遗忘反映出随着时间的推移记忆表征的可及性降低。另一方面,更长的保持间隔并未调节回忆的精度——这表明遗忘并不影响可及记忆表征的精度。因此,当直立和倒置的面孔被遗忘时,存在完全无法访问它们或其记忆表征完全崩溃的情况。与保持间隔(即遗忘)的效应相反,面孔倒置会导致更大的错误,这些错误主要与回忆精度的降低有关。这种效应不受保持间隔时长的调节,甚至在任务中不需要记忆时也会出现。因此,由于感知过程而非记忆过程,直立面孔比倒置面孔能被更精确地记住。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/96bb31eb4917/fpsyg-09-01319-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/539ac3627a8a/fpsyg-09-01319-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/a9518ecbbd5b/fpsyg-09-01319-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/1b35c96252c4/fpsyg-09-01319-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/d64a5234ddf4/fpsyg-09-01319-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/852a6d8be506/fpsyg-09-01319-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/96bb31eb4917/fpsyg-09-01319-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/539ac3627a8a/fpsyg-09-01319-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/a9518ecbbd5b/fpsyg-09-01319-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/1b35c96252c4/fpsyg-09-01319-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/d64a5234ddf4/fpsyg-09-01319-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/852a6d8be506/fpsyg-09-01319-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8834/6074000/96bb31eb4917/fpsyg-09-01319-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Rapid Forgetting of Faces.对面孔的快速遗忘
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 27;9:1319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01319. eCollection 2018.
2
Rapid forgetting of faces in congenital prosopagnosia.先天性面孔失认症患者对面孔的快速遗忘。
Cortex. 2020 Aug;129:119-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
3
Recognition-induced forgetting of faces in visual long-term memory.视觉长期记忆中识别诱导的面孔遗忘。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):1878-1885. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1419-1.
4
Not all information in visual working memory is forgotten equally.并非视觉工作记忆中的所有信息都会被同等遗忘。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102782. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102782. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
5
Weaker face recognition in adults with autism arises from perceptually based alterations.自闭症成年人较弱的人脸识别能力源于基于感知的改变。
Autism Res. 2023 Apr;16(4):723-733. doi: 10.1002/aur.2893. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Electrophysiological evidence for parts and wholes in visual face memory.视觉面部记忆中部分与整体的电生理证据。
Cortex. 2016 Oct;83:246-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
7
Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory.对直立面孔的专业识别能力提高了视觉工作记忆的精度,但没有提高其容量。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):1975-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0653-z.
8
Are stronger memories forgotten more slowly? No evidence that memory strength influences the rate of forgetting.记忆较强的内容遗忘得更慢吗?没有证据表明记忆强度会影响遗忘的速度。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 13;13(7):e0200292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200292. eCollection 2018.
9
Forgetting in visual working memory: Internal noise explains decay of feature representations.视觉工作记忆中的遗忘:内部噪声解释了特征表示的衰减。
J Vis. 2022 Jul 11;22(8):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.8.8.
10
Intentionally forgetting other-race faces: costs and benefits?有意遗忘异族面孔:代价与收益?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Jun;19(2):130-42. doi: 10.1037/a0033287.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Working Memory for Faces and Facial Expressions as a Useful "Tool" for Understanding Social and Affective Cognition.面部和面部表情的视觉工作记忆作为理解社会和情感认知的有用“工具”。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02392. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Encoding differences affect the number and precision of own-race versus other-race faces stored in visual working memory.编码差异会影响视觉工作记忆中存储的本族面孔与其他种族面孔的数量和精准度。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):702-712. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1467-6.
2
Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory.快速遗忘源于视觉工作记忆中各项目随时间的竞争。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):528-536. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000328. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Visual short-term memory binding deficit in familial Alzheimer's disease.
家族性阿尔茨海默病中的视觉短期记忆绑定缺陷
Cortex. 2016 May;78:150-164. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.整体面部加工的荟萃分析与综述
Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1281-302. doi: 10.1037/a0037004. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
5
Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory.对直立面孔的专业识别能力提高了视觉工作记忆的精度,但没有提高其容量。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):1975-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0653-z.
6
Changing concepts of working memory.工作记忆概念的变化。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56. doi: 10.1038/nn.3655. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
7
Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: a matter of working memory consolidation.呈现方式在工作记忆程序中的差异:工作记忆巩固的问题。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):417-28. doi: 10.1037/a0034301. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
8
The privileged role of location in visual working memory.位置在视觉工作记忆中的特殊作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):1914-24. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0541-y.
9
Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.视觉工作记忆容量:从心理物理学和神经生物学到个体差异。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
10
Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues.回溯性注意提示可防止快速遗忘。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1224-31. doi: 10.1037/a0030947. Epub 2012 Dec 17.