• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生长发育期骨性开颌患者腭部形态的几何形态测量分析

Geometric morphometric analysis of the palatal morphology in growing subjects with skeletal open bite.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy.

Department of Dentistry UNSBC, Tirana, Albania.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2019 May 24;41(3):258-263. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy055.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjy055
PMID:30102344
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the morphological shape variations of the palatal vault in Open Bite (OB) growing subjects when compared with a Control Group (CG) by means of Geometric Morphometric Method (GMM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The OB Group (OBG) consisted of 75 subjects (39 females, 36 males; mean age: 8.5 ± 0.8 years) who were collected retrospectively with the following inclusion criteria: European ancestry, overbite less than 0 mm, mixed dentition stage, prepubertal skeletal maturation (CS1-CS2), hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (SN^GoGn > 37°). The OBG was compared with a CG of 46 prepubertal subjects presenting normal occlusion (24 females, 22 males; mean age of 8.3 ± 1.7 years). For each subject, lateral cephalograms and maxillary dental casts were available. Landmarks and semilandmarks were digitized on digital dental casts and GMM was applied. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed. OBG was divided in two subgroups: Sucking Habits Group (SHG) (39 subjects) and Non-Sucking Habits Group (NSHG) (36 subjects).

RESULTS

PC1 showed significant morphological changes in transverse and vertical dimensions with OBG palates higher and narrower when compared with CG. When comparing the two subgroups no statistically significant differences were found. NSHG demonstrated a slight reduction of the transverse dimension and a deeper palatal vault respect to SHG.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this study were the division of OBG in two subgroups based on referral of thumb sucking habits without assessing the duration and the intensity of thumb sucking.

CONCLUSIONS

OB subjects presented with a significant constriction of the maxillary arch when compared with CG. The morphological palatal shape variations in OBG were not influenced by the presence or absence of non-nutritive sucking habits.

摘要

目的

通过几何形态测量法(GMM)评估安氏 Ⅱ类 1 分类(高角)生长发育期患者的腭穹窿形态变化,并与对照组(CG)进行比较。

材料和方法

OB 组(OBG)由 75 名患者组成(39 名女性,36 名男性;平均年龄:8.5±0.8 岁),其入选标准为:欧洲血统,覆颌小于 0mm,混合牙列期,青春期前骨骼成熟度(CS1-CS2),超型(SN^GoGn>37°)。将 OBG 与 46 名具有正常覆颌(24 名女性,22 名男性;平均年龄 8.3±1.7 岁)的 CG 进行比较。每位患者均有侧位头颅侧位片和上颌牙模。在数字牙模上标记标志点和半标志点,进行 GMM 分析。进行 Procrustes 分析和主成分分析(PCA)。将 OBG 分为两组:吸吮习惯组(SHG)(39 名患者)和非吸吮习惯组(NSHG)(36 名患者)。

结果

PC1 显示出横向和垂直方向的形态变化,与 CG 相比,OBG 的腭穹窿更高、更窄。比较两组时,无统计学差异。与 SHG 相比,NSHG 显示出横向尺寸略有减小,腭穹窿深度增加。

局限性

本研究的局限性在于,根据拇指吸吮习惯的转介将 OBG 分为两组,但未评估拇指吸吮的持续时间和强度。

结论

与 CG 相比,安氏 Ⅱ类 1 分类(高角)患者的上颌弓明显变窄。OBG 腭穹窿形态变化不受非营养性吸吮习惯的存在与否的影响。

相似文献

1
Geometric morphometric analysis of the palatal morphology in growing subjects with skeletal open bite.生长发育期骨性开颌患者腭部形态的几何形态测量分析
Eur J Orthod. 2019 May 24;41(3):258-263. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy055.
2
Palatal vault morphometric analysis of the effects of two early orthodontic treatments in anterior open bite growing subjects: a controlled clinical study.腭穹窿形态计量分析两种早期正畸治疗对生长前期前牙开合患者的影响:一项对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01886-5.
3
Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects.II类生长发育期受试者腭部形态与骨骼模式之间的形态计量协变关系。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):371-376. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx014.
4
Evaluation of the morphometric covariation between palatal and craniofacial skeletal morphology in class III malocclusion growing subjects.评价 III 类错颌生长发育患者腭部和颅面骨骼形态的形态学共变关系。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01140-4.
5
Morphometric analysis of the palatal shape and arch dimension in subjects with buccally displaced canine.颊侧错位尖牙患者腭部形态和牙弓维度的计量分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Nov 3;42(5):544-550. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz091.
6
Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensions and palatal morphology in mouth-breathing children by using digital dental casts.使用数字化牙模评估口呼吸儿童的上颌牙弓尺寸和腭部形态。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;78(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
3D evaluation of maxillary morphology in Marfan growing subjects: a controlled clinical study.马凡综合征生长发育期患者上颌形态的三维评估:一项对照临床研究。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Mar 18;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0264-2.
8
Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.儿童和青少年腭部形态与骨骼模式之间的形态测量协变:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):377-385. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw063.
9
Mandibular morphometric analysis in open bite early treatment relapse subjects: a retrospective observational pilot study.开颌早期治疗复发患者下颌形态学分析:一项回顾性观察性初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02546-y.
10
Sucking habits and facial hyperdivergency as risk factors for anterior open bite in the mixed dentition.吮指习惯和面部高度离散作为混合牙列期前牙开(牙合)的危险因素。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):517-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Invisalign® first system on molar width and incisor torque in malocclusion during the mixed dentition period.Invisalign® 第一代系统对混合牙列期错颌中磨牙宽度和切牙转矩的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038742.
2
Three-dimensional evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with anterior open bite.前牙开颌患者咽气道间隙的三维评估
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Nov 25;53(6):358-364. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.187. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Mandibular morphometric analysis in open bite early treatment relapse subjects: a retrospective observational pilot study.
开颌早期治疗复发患者下颌形态学分析:一项回顾性观察性初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02546-y.
4
Evaluation of the Upper Arch Morphological Changes after Two Different Protocols of Expansion in Early Mixed Dentition: Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Invisalign First System.早期混合牙列期两种不同扩弓方案后上颌牙弓形态变化的评估:快速上颌扩弓和隐适美First矫正系统
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;12(9):1323. doi: 10.3390/life12091323.
5
Palatal vault morphometric analysis of the effects of two early orthodontic treatments in anterior open bite growing subjects: a controlled clinical study.腭穹窿形态计量分析两种早期正畸治疗对生长前期前牙开合患者的影响:一项对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01886-5.
6
Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns.不同矢状和垂直骨面型患者腭部三维重建形态的初步比较
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1041-9.
7
Lower Arch Dimensions in Children with Anterior Open Bite and Normal Vertical Overbite: A Cross-sectional Study.前牙开颌与正常垂直覆颌儿童的下颌牙弓尺寸:一项横断面研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Nov 4;9(6):571-575. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_163_19. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
8
A sparse principal component analysis of Class III malocclusions.稀疏主成分分析在 III 类错颌畸形中的应用。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):768-774. doi: 10.2319/100518-717.1. Epub 2019 Mar 21.