Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxforx, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Department of Dentistry UNSBC, Tirana, Albania.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02546-y.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the mandibular shape differences between a group of success and a group of failure Anterior Open Bite (AOB) malocclusion early orthodontic treatment in growing subjects, in order to identify mandibular features of relapse.
Twenty three patients (7 males, 16 females, 9.3 years ±1,5 years) were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Inclusion criteria were: white ancestry, overbite < 0 mm, mixed dentition phase, end-to-end or Class I molar relationship, first skeletal class assessed on lateral cephalograms (0° < ANB < 4°), cervical skeletal maturation CS1-CS2, no previous orthodontic treatment, no congenital diseases. Pre-treatment (T1) lateral cephalograms were acquired. Each patient underwent early orthodontic treatment with Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) and Bite Block (BB) or Quad-Helix Crib (QHC) until open bite correction. Radiographic records were recollected at T2 (permanent dentition, skeletal cervical maturation CS3-CS4). Mean interval time T2-T1 was 4.2 years ±6 months. According to treatment stability, a Relapse Group (RG 11 patients, 3 M, 8F; 13.7 years ±8 months, 7 subjects treated with RME/BB, 4 with QH/C) and a Success Group (SG, 12 patients, 4 M, 8F; 13.4 ± 10 months, 7 subjects treated with QH/C, 5 with RME/BB) were identified. On the lateral radiographs the mandibular length (Co-Gn), the inferior gonial angle (NGo^GoMe) and the antegonial notch depth (AND) were analyzed. Then the mandibular Geometric Morphometric analysis (GMM) was applied. Intergroup statistically significant differences were found using student's t-tests. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for the GMM.
At T1 no statistically significant differences were found between RG and SG, however higher values of antegonial notch depth were found in RG. T2-T1 comparison showed in RG statistically significant increases in Co-Gn (p = 0.04), NGo^GoMe angle (p = 0.01) and antegonial notch depth (p = 0,04). PC1 confirmed the increase in the antegonial notch depth in RG when compared to SG at T2.
The increased antegonial notch depth associated with the increased mandibular length and the increased gonial angle could be responsible of relapse of early orthodontic treatment in open bite growing subjects.
本回顾性研究的目的是评估一组成功组和一组失败组安氏 1 分类前牙开颌(AOB)错畸形患者在生长发育期早期正畸治疗的下颌形态差异,以确定复发的下颌特征。
从罗马 Tor Vergata 大学正畸科招募了 23 名患者(7 名男性,16 名女性,9.3±1.5 岁)。纳入标准为:白种人后裔、覆颌<0mm、混合牙列期、端对端或 I 类磨牙关系、侧位头颅侧位片上第一骨骼分类(0°<ANB<4°)、颈椎成熟度 CS1-CS2、无既往正畸治疗、无先天性疾病。采集治疗前(T1)侧位头颅侧位片。每位患者均接受快速扩弓(RME)和咬合板(BB)或四头螺旋扩弓器(QHC)早期正畸治疗,直至纠正前牙开颌。T2(恒牙期,颈椎成熟度 CS3-CS4)时再次采集影像学记录。T2-T1 的平均时间间隔为 4.2 年±6 个月。根据治疗稳定性,将患者分为复发组(RG,11 例,3 男,8 女;13.7±8 岁,7 例接受 RME/BB 治疗,4 例接受 QH/C 治疗)和成功组(SG,12 例,4 男,8 女;13.4±10 岁,7 例接受 QH/C 治疗,5 例接受 RME/BB 治疗)。在侧位片上分析下颌长度(Co-Gn)、下颔角(NGo^GoMe)和下颌前切迹深度(AND)。然后进行下颌几何形态测量分析(GMM)。使用学生 t 检验比较组间统计学差异。对 GMM 进行 Procrustes 分析和主成分分析(PCA)。
T1 时,RG 和 SG 之间无统计学差异,但 RG 的下颌前切迹深度值较高。T2-T1 比较显示,在 RG 中,Co-Gn(p=0.04)、NGo^GoMe 角度(p=0.01)和下颌前切迹深度(p=0.04)均有统计学显著增加。PC1 证实,与 SG 相比,RG 在 T2 时下颌前切迹深度增加。
下颌前切迹深度增加,伴下颌长度增加和下颌角增大,可能是导致生长发育期前牙开颌患者早期正畸治疗复发的原因。