• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A sparse principal component analysis of Class III malocclusions.稀疏主成分分析在 III 类错颌畸形中的应用。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):768-774. doi: 10.2319/100518-717.1. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.在骨性III类患者接受双颌旋转正颌手术后,使用三维相机进行面部软组织分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;42(3):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
3
Effects of different surgical techniques and displacement distances on the soft tissue profile via orthodontic-orthognathic treatment of class II and class III malocclusions.不同外科手术技术及骨块移动距离对上、下颌骨二类及三类错(牙合)畸形患者正畸正颌联合治疗后面部软组织侧貌的影响
Head Face Med. 2021 Apr 14;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00264-4.
4
[Preliminary evaluation on 3-demension changes of facial soft tissue with structure light scanning technique before and after orthognathic surgery of Class III deformities].[正颌外科手术治疗Ⅲ类错畸形前后面部软组织三维变化的结构光扫描技术初步评价]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Feb 18;47(1):98-103.
5
[Three dimensional study on change ratios of hard and soft tissue after orthognathic surgery].[正颌外科手术后软硬组织变化率的三维研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019;28(2):158-164.
6
Facial soft-tissue changes in skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients analyzed with 3-dimensional laser scanning.三维激光扫描分析骨性Ⅲ类错颌正颌手术患者的面软组织变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):167-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.022.
7
Three-dimensional soft tissue changes according to skeletal changes after mandibular setback surgery by using cone-beam computed tomography and a structured light scanner.利用锥形束 CT 和结构光扫描仪研究下颌骨后退术后骨骼变化对应软组织的三维变化。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Jul 1;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0282-0.
8
Determining normal and abnormal lip shapes at border positions for use as a longitudinal surgical outcome measure.确定唇缘位置的正常和异常唇形,作为纵向手术结果的衡量标准。
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 May;40(5):348-57. doi: 10.1111/joor.12037. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Three-dimensional phenotype characteristics of skeletal class III malocclusion in adult Chinese: a principal component analysis-based cluster analysis.基于主成分分析的聚类分析:成人中国骨性 III 类错颌畸形的三维表型特征。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4173-4189. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05033-y. Epub 2023 May 1.
10
Correlation analysis of three-dimensional changes of hard and soft tissues in class III orthognathic surgery patients using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对III类正颌手术患者软硬组织三维变化的相关性分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jul;25(4):1530-40. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000620.

引用本文的文献

1
Orthodontic treatment outcome predictive performance differences between artificial intelligence and conventional methods.正畸治疗结果预测性能的人工智能与传统方法比较。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Sep 1;94(5):557-565. doi: 10.2319/111823-767.1.
2
East Asian and Southern European craniofacial class III phenotype: two sides of the same coin?东亚和南欧颅面III类表型:同一硬币的两面?
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 9;28(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05386-4.
3
Evaluation of an automated superimposition method based on multiple landmarks for growing patients.基于多个标志点的生长患者自动配准方法的评估。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):226-232. doi: 10.2319/010121-1.1.
4
Evaluation of automated cephalometric analysis based on the latest deep learning method.基于最新深度学习方法的自动头影测量分析评估。
Angle Orthod. 2021 May 1;91(3):329-335. doi: 10.2319/021220-100.1.
5
How much deep learning is enough for automatic identification to be reliable?深度学习达到多少才能保证自动识别的可靠性?
Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):823-830. doi: 10.2319/021920-116.1.
6
Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.自动叠加法在计算机辅助头影测量中的评价。
Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):390-396. doi: 10.2319/071319-469.1.
7
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
8
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: .自动识别头影测量标志点:.
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):903-909. doi: 10.2319/022019-127.1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Predicting soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery: .预测正颌手术后软组织的变化: 。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):910-916. doi: 10.2319/120518-851.1. Epub 2019 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Geometric morphometric analysis of the palatal morphology in growing subjects with skeletal open bite.生长发育期骨性开颌患者腭部形态的几何形态测量分析
Eur J Orthod. 2019 May 24;41(3):258-263. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy055.
2
Correlation between the cross-sectional morphology of the mandible and the three-dimensional facial skeletal pattern: A structural equation modeling approach.下颌骨横断形态与三维面骨形态结构的相关性:结构方程模型方法。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Jan;89(1):78-86. doi: 10.2319/122117-879.1. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
Relationship between tooth length and three-dimensional mandibular morphology.牙齿长度与下颌骨三维形态的关系。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jul;88(4):403-409. doi: 10.2319/103017-734.1. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
4
Genetic polymorphisms underlying the skeletal Class III phenotype.骨骼Ⅲ类错(牙合)畸形相关的基因多态性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):700-707. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.013.
5
Geometric morphometric analysis of the palatal morphology in children with impacted incisors: A three-dimensional evaluation.埋伏切牙患儿腭部形态的几何形态测量分析:三维评估
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):404-408. doi: 10.2319/071716-557.1. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
6
New algorithm for semiautomatic segmentation of nasal cavity and pharyngeal airway in comparison with manual segmentation using cone-beam computed tomography.与使用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行手动分割相比的鼻腔和咽气道半自动分割新算法。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Oct;150(4):703-712. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.024.
7
Reproducibility of the lip position at rest: A 3-dimensional perspective.静息时唇部位置的可重复性:三维视角
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.029.
8
Selecting subjects with high craniofacial shape homogeneity for clinical trials.为临床试验选择颅面形状同质性高的受试者。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Dec;148(6):1026-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.033.
9
A more accurate soft-tissue prediction model for Class III 2-jaw surgeries.一种用于Ⅲ类双颌手术的更精确软组织预测模型。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Dec;146(6):724-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.010.
10
A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis.一种惩罚矩阵分解及其在稀疏主成分分析和典型相关分析中的应用。
Biostatistics. 2009 Jul;10(3):515-34. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

稀疏主成分分析在 III 类错颌畸形中的应用。

A sparse principal component analysis of Class III malocclusions.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):768-774. doi: 10.2319/100518-717.1. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.2319/100518-717.1
PMID:30896249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8111842/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most characteristic variables out of a large number of anatomic landmark variables on three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images. A modified principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify which anatomic structures would demonstrate the major variabilities that would most characterize the patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 217 patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusions who had undergone orthognathic surgery. The input variables were composed of a total of 740 variables consisting of three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates and their Euclidean distances of 104 soft tissue and 81 hard tissue landmarks identified on the CT images. A statistical method, a modified PCA based on the penalized matrix decomposition, was performed to extract the principal components.

RESULTS

The first 10 (8 soft tissue, 2 hard tissue) principal components from the 740 input variables explained 63% of the total variance. The most conspicuous principal components indicated that groups of soft tissue variables on the nose, lips, and eyes explained more variability than skeletal variables did. In other words, these soft tissue components were most representative of the differences among the Class III patients.

CONCLUSIONS

On three-dimensional images, soft tissues had more variability than the skeletal anatomic structures. In the assessment of three-dimensional facial variability, a limited number of anatomic landmarks being used today did not seem sufficient. Nevertheless, this modified PCA may be used to analyze orthodontic three-dimensional images in the future, but it may not fully express the variability of the patients.

摘要

目的

从三维 CT 图像上大量解剖标志变量中识别出最具特征的变量。采用改进的主成分分析(PCA)来确定哪些解剖结构将表现出最大的变异性,从而最能描述患者的特征。

材料和方法

从 217 名接受正颌手术的严重骨骼 III 类错畸形患者中收集数据。输入变量由总共 740 个变量组成,包括三维笛卡尔坐标及其在 CT 图像上识别的 104 个软组织和 81 个硬组织标志的欧几里得距离。采用基于惩罚矩阵分解的改进 PCA 进行统计分析,以提取主成分。

结果

从 740 个输入变量中提取的前 10 个(8 个硬组织,2 个软组织)主成分解释了总方差的 63%。最显著的主成分表明,鼻子、嘴唇和眼睛上的软组织变量组比骨骼变量组具有更大的变异性。换句话说,这些软组织成分最能代表 III 类患者之间的差异。

结论

在三维图像上,软组织的变异性大于骨骼解剖结构。在评估三维面部变异性时,目前使用的少数解剖标志似乎不够充分。然而,这种改进的 PCA 可用于分析未来的正畸三维图像,但可能无法完全表达患者的变异性。