Suppr超能文献

DCE-MRR 与 Tc-DTPA 基 SPECT 用于移植肾功能测定的前瞻性比较。

Prospective comparison between DCE-MRR and Tc-DTPA-based SPECT for determination of allograft renal function.

机构信息

Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jan;49(1):262-269. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26188. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a preferred indicator of allograft renal function, but direct measurement of GFR remains complicated.

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare dynamic contrast-enhanced MR renography (DCE-MRR) with Tc-DTPA-based single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for determination of allograft renal function.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Seventy kidney-transplant recipients FIELD STRENGTH: A low-dose DCE-MRR with a 3.0T scanner and a Tc-DTPA-based SPECT after renal transplantation were performed.

ASSESSMENT

A Baumann-Rudin (BR) and a modified two-compartment model (JZ2C) were used for DCE-MRR analysis. Standard Gate's method was used for SPECT analysis. An endogenous creatinine clearance rate (CCr) constituted the reference standard.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Pearson correlation test and Bland-Altman agreement analysis.

RESULTS

The reference CCr-GFR was 59.58 ± 23.72 mL/min/1.73 m . GFR determined by eGFR, BR, JZ2C, and SPECT was 90.22 ± 34.38, 36.78 ± 14.46, 48.99 ± 23.88, and 67.32 ± 18.44 mL/min/1.73 m , respectively. DCE-MRR using JZ2C had the best overall performance, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.81, a bias of -10.58 mL/min/1.73 m , and a precision of 14.61 mL/min/1.73 m , as well as high accuracy (30-50% intervals: 74.3-90.0%). Although SPECT had a small bias (7.74 mL/min/1.73 m ), it had a poor correlation coefficient (0.38), poor precision (23.93 mL/min/1.73 m ), and low accuracy (64.3-72.3%) as compared with DCE-MRR using JZ2C.

DATA CONCLUSION

DCE-MRR using JZ2C is superior to Tc-DTPA-based SPECT to determine allograft renal function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:262-269.

摘要

背景

肾小球滤过率(GFR)是评估移植物肾功能的首选指标,但 GFR 的直接测量仍然很复杂。

目的

前瞻性比较动态对比增强磁共振肾造影术(DCE-MRR)与 Tc-DTPA 单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在评估移植物肾功能中的应用。

研究类型

前瞻性。

人群

70 例肾移植受者。

磁场强度

在肾移植后使用 3.0T 扫描仪进行低剂量 DCE-MRR 和 Tc-DTPA 基 SPECT。

评估

使用 Baumann-Rudin(BR)和改良两室模型(JZ2C)进行 DCE-MRR 分析。使用标准门控法进行 SPECT 分析。内源性肌酐清除率(CCr)作为参考标准。

统计检验

Pearson 相关检验和 Bland-Altman 一致性分析。

结果

参考 CCr-GFR 为 59.58±23.72mL/min/1.73m。eGFR、BR、JZ2C 和 SPECT 测定的 GFR 分别为 90.22±34.38、36.78±14.46、48.99±23.88 和 67.32±18.44mL/min/1.73m。使用 JZ2C 的 DCE-MRR 整体性能最佳,Pearson 相关系数为 0.81,偏倚为-10.58mL/min/1.73m,精度为 14.61mL/min/1.73m,准确性高(30-50%区间:74.3-90.0%)。尽管 SPECT 的偏倚较小(7.74mL/min/1.73m),但其相关系数(0.38)较低,精度(23.93mL/min/1.73m)较差,准确性(64.3-72.3%)较低,与使用 JZ2C 的 DCE-MRR 相比。

数据结论

与 Tc-DTPA 基 SPECT 相比,使用 JZ2C 的 DCE-MRR 更能准确评估移植物肾功能。

证据水平

2 技术功效:2 级。J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:262-269。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验