Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jan;49(1):262-269. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26188. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a preferred indicator of allograft renal function, but direct measurement of GFR remains complicated.
To prospectively compare dynamic contrast-enhanced MR renography (DCE-MRR) with Tc-DTPA-based single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for determination of allograft renal function.
Prospective.
Seventy kidney-transplant recipients FIELD STRENGTH: A low-dose DCE-MRR with a 3.0T scanner and a Tc-DTPA-based SPECT after renal transplantation were performed.
A Baumann-Rudin (BR) and a modified two-compartment model (JZ2C) were used for DCE-MRR analysis. Standard Gate's method was used for SPECT analysis. An endogenous creatinine clearance rate (CCr) constituted the reference standard.
Pearson correlation test and Bland-Altman agreement analysis.
The reference CCr-GFR was 59.58 ± 23.72 mL/min/1.73 m . GFR determined by eGFR, BR, JZ2C, and SPECT was 90.22 ± 34.38, 36.78 ± 14.46, 48.99 ± 23.88, and 67.32 ± 18.44 mL/min/1.73 m , respectively. DCE-MRR using JZ2C had the best overall performance, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.81, a bias of -10.58 mL/min/1.73 m , and a precision of 14.61 mL/min/1.73 m , as well as high accuracy (30-50% intervals: 74.3-90.0%). Although SPECT had a small bias (7.74 mL/min/1.73 m ), it had a poor correlation coefficient (0.38), poor precision (23.93 mL/min/1.73 m ), and low accuracy (64.3-72.3%) as compared with DCE-MRR using JZ2C.
DCE-MRR using JZ2C is superior to Tc-DTPA-based SPECT to determine allograft renal function.
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:262-269.
肾小球滤过率(GFR)是评估移植物肾功能的首选指标,但 GFR 的直接测量仍然很复杂。
前瞻性比较动态对比增强磁共振肾造影术(DCE-MRR)与 Tc-DTPA 单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在评估移植物肾功能中的应用。
前瞻性。
70 例肾移植受者。
在肾移植后使用 3.0T 扫描仪进行低剂量 DCE-MRR 和 Tc-DTPA 基 SPECT。
使用 Baumann-Rudin(BR)和改良两室模型(JZ2C)进行 DCE-MRR 分析。使用标准门控法进行 SPECT 分析。内源性肌酐清除率(CCr)作为参考标准。
Pearson 相关检验和 Bland-Altman 一致性分析。
参考 CCr-GFR 为 59.58±23.72mL/min/1.73m。eGFR、BR、JZ2C 和 SPECT 测定的 GFR 分别为 90.22±34.38、36.78±14.46、48.99±23.88 和 67.32±18.44mL/min/1.73m。使用 JZ2C 的 DCE-MRR 整体性能最佳,Pearson 相关系数为 0.81,偏倚为-10.58mL/min/1.73m,精度为 14.61mL/min/1.73m,准确性高(30-50%区间:74.3-90.0%)。尽管 SPECT 的偏倚较小(7.74mL/min/1.73m),但其相关系数(0.38)较低,精度(23.93mL/min/1.73m)较差,准确性(64.3-72.3%)较低,与使用 JZ2C 的 DCE-MRR 相比。
与 Tc-DTPA 基 SPECT 相比,使用 JZ2C 的 DCE-MRR 更能准确评估移植物肾功能。
2 技术功效:2 级。J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:262-269。