• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病患者存在明显的非记忆缺陷与疾病的快速进展有关。

Prominent Non-Memory Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease Are Associated with Faster Disease Progression.

机构信息

Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(3):1029-1039. doi: 10.3233/JAD-171088.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-171088
PMID:30103316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6588161/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disorder.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether cognitive AD subtypes are associated with different rates of disease progression.

METHODS

We included 1,066 probable AD patients from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n = 290), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (n = 268), Dementia Competence Network (n = 226), and University of California, San Francisco (n = 282) with available follow-up data. Patients were previously clustered into two subtypes based on their neuropsychological test results: one with most prominent memory impairment (n = 663) and one with most prominent non-memory impairment (n = 403). We examined associations between cognitive subtype and disease progression, as measured with repeated Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes (CDR sob), using linear mixed models. Furthermore, we investigated mortality risk associated with subtypes using Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Patients were 71±9 years old; 541 (51%) were female. At baseline, pooled non-memory patients had worse MMSE scores (23.1±0.1) and slightly worse CDR sob (4.4±0.1) than memory patients (MMSE 24.0±0.1; p < 0.001; CDR sob 4.1±0.1; p < 0.001). During follow-up, pooled non-memory patients showed steeper annual decline in MMSE (-2.8±0.1) and steeper annual increase in CDR sob (1.8±0.1) than memory patients (MMSE - 1.9±0.1; pinteraction<0.001; CDR sob 1.3±0.1; pinteraction<0.001). Furthermore, the non-memory subtype was associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with the memory subtype at trend level (HR = 1.36, CI = 1.00-1.85, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AD patients with most prominently non-memory impairment show faster disease progression and higher risk of mortality than patients with most prominently memory impairment.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种异质性疾病。

目的

研究认知 AD 亚型是否与不同的疾病进展速度有关。

方法

我们纳入了来自阿姆斯特丹痴呆队列(n=290)、阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(n=268)、痴呆能力网络(n=226)和加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(n=282)的 1066 例可能的 AD 患者,这些患者都有随访数据。根据神经心理学测试结果,患者之前被分为两个亚型:以记忆障碍为主(n=663)和以非记忆障碍为主(n=403)。我们使用线性混合模型检查认知亚型与疾病进展(以重复的简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和临床痴呆评定量表总和(CDR sob)测量)之间的关联。此外,我们使用 Cox 比例风险分析研究了与亚型相关的死亡率风险。

结果

患者年龄为 71±9 岁;541 名(51%)为女性。基线时,混合型非记忆患者的 MMSE 评分(23.1±0.1)和 CDR sob(4.4±0.1)略差于记忆型患者(MMSE 24.0±0.1;p<0.001;CDR sob 4.1±0.1;p<0.001)。在随访期间,混合型非记忆患者的 MMSE 年下降幅度(-2.8±0.1)和 CDR sob 年上升幅度(1.8±0.1)均大于记忆型患者(MMSE -1.9±0.1;p 交互<0.001;CDR sob 1.3±0.1;p 交互<0.001)。此外,非记忆亚型与记忆亚型相比,死亡风险增加趋势(HR=1.36,CI=1.00-1.85,p=0.05)。

结论

以非记忆障碍为主的 AD 患者比以记忆障碍为主的患者疾病进展更快,死亡风险更高。

相似文献

1
Prominent Non-Memory Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease Are Associated with Faster Disease Progression.阿尔茨海默病患者存在明显的非记忆缺陷与疾病的快速进展有关。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(3):1029-1039. doi: 10.3233/JAD-171088.
2
Longitudinal Neuropsychological Outcome in Taiwanese Alzheimer's Disease Patients Treated with Medication.台湾地区接受药物治疗的阿尔茨海默病患者的纵向神经心理学转归
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018 Mar 14;15(5):474-481. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666171010112518.
3
Tracking Cognitive Decline in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early-Stage Alzheimer Dementia: Mini-Mental State Examination versus Neuropsychological Battery.追踪遗忘型轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病痴呆的认知衰退:简易精神状态检查表与神经心理成套测验的比较
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(1-2):105-117. doi: 10.1159/000478520. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
Progression of Alzheimer's Disease: A Longitudinal Study in Norwegian Memory Clinics.阿尔茨海默病的进展:挪威记忆诊所的纵向研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(3):1221-1232. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170436.
5
How Do Scores on the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SOB Correspond?阿尔茨海默病协作研究认知量表(ADAS-Cog)、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和临床痴呆评定量表-总和版(CDR-SOB)的评分如何对应?
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(7):1002-9. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1119312. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Effects of education on the progression of early- versus late-stage mild cognitive impairment.教育对早期和晚期轻度认知障碍进展的影响。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Apr;25(4):597-606. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
7
Effectiveness of a Standardized and Specific Follow-Up in Memory Centers in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病患者记忆中心标准化特异性随访的有效性
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(3):255-267. doi: 10.2174/1567205013666161108114850.
8
Different Cognitive Profiles Are Associated with Progression Rate and Age at Death in Probable Alzheimer's Disease.不同认知特征与可能的阿尔茨海默病的进展率和死亡年龄相关。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(2):735-747. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201124.
9
Progression of Alzheimer's disease during a three-year follow-up using the CERAD-NB total score: Kuopio ALSOVA study.使用 CERAD-NB 总分对阿尔茨海默病进行为期三年的随访:库奥皮奥 ALSOVA 研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Aug;25(8):1335-44. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000653. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Disease Course Varies According to Age and Symptom Length in Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病的病程随年龄和症状持续时间而变化。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(2):631-642. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170841.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival Differences Between Individuals With Typical and Atypical Phenotypes of Alzheimer Disease.阿尔茨海默病典型与非典型表型个体之间的生存差异。
Neurology. 2025 May 27;104(10):e213603. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213603. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
The higher benefit of lecanemab in males compared to females in CLARITY AD is probably due to a real sex effect.在CLARITY AD研究中,与女性相比,lecanemab对男性的益处更高,这可能是由于真正的性别效应。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jan;21(1):e14467. doi: 10.1002/alz.14467.
3
Characterizing the clinical heterogeneity of early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease: a data-driven machine learning approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive subtypes of probable Alzheimer's disease robustly identified in four cohorts.在四个队列中,明确识别出可能的阿尔茨海默病的认知亚型。
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Nov;13(11):1226-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
2
The executive prominent/memory prominent spectrum in Alzheimer's disease is highly heritable.阿尔茨海默病中的执行功能突出/记忆突出谱系具有高度遗传性。
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 May;41:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
3
Heterogeneity of Regional Brain Atrophy Patterns Associated with Distinct Progression Rates in Alzheimer's Disease.
表征早期症状性阿尔茨海默病的临床异质性:一种数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Aug 12;16:1410544. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1410544. eCollection 2024.
4
A multimodal deep learning approach for the prediction of cognitive decline and its effectiveness in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.一种用于预测认知能力下降的多模态深度学习方法及其在阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的有效性。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 21;14(1):105. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02819-w.
5
Heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease identified by neuropsychological test profiling.通过神经心理学测试分析鉴定阿尔茨海默病的异质性。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292527. eCollection 2023.
6
Cognitive differences across ethnoracial category, socioeconomic status across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum: Can an ability discrepancy score level the playing field?不同种族和民族类别之间的认知差异,阿尔茨海默病谱中的社会经济地位差异:能力差异评分能否拉平差距?
Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):543-560. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01304-3. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
7
Functional Integrity of Executive Control Network Contributed to Retained Executive Abilities in Mild Cognitive Impairment.执行控制网络的功能完整性有助于轻度认知障碍患者保留执行能力。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Nov 26;13:710172. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.710172. eCollection 2021.
8
Using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to improve early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.利用阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议改善阿尔茨海默病的早期检测、诊断和治疗。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):824-857. doi: 10.1002/alz.12422. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
9
Finding Treatment Effects in Alzheimer Trials in the Face of Disease Progression Heterogeneity.面对疾病进展异质性,在阿尔茨海默病试验中寻找治疗效果。
Neurology. 2021 Jun 1;96(22):e2673-e2684. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012022.
10
Understanding and predicting the longitudinal course of dementia.理解和预测痴呆的纵向病程。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;32(2):123-129. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000482.
与阿尔茨海默病不同进展速率相关的脑区萎缩模式的异质性
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 30;10(11):e0142756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142756. eCollection 2015.
4
Atrophy patterns in early clinical stages across distinct phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病不同表型早期临床阶段的萎缩模式。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4421-37. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22927. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
5
The behavioural/dysexecutive variant of Alzheimer's disease: clinical, neuroimaging and pathological features.阿尔茨海默病的行为/执行功能障碍变异型:临床、神经影像学和病理特征
Brain. 2015 Sep;138(Pt 9):2732-49. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv191. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and cerebral atrophy in distinct clinical variants of probable Alzheimer's disease.可能的阿尔茨海默病不同临床变体中的脑脊液生物标志物与脑萎缩
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Aug;36(8):2340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
7
Optimizing patient care and research: the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort.优化患者护理与研究:阿姆斯特丹痴呆症队列研究
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(1):313-27. doi: 10.3233/JAD-132306.
8
Differences between early and late onset Alzheimer's disease.早发性和晚发性阿尔茨海默病之间的差异。
Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2013 Nov 29;2(4):300-6. eCollection 2013.
9
Regional atrophy is associated with impairment in distinct cognitive domains in Alzheimer's disease.区域性萎缩与阿尔茨海默病患者不同认知领域的损害有关。
Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Oct;10(5 Suppl):S299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease.对 74046 人的荟萃分析确定了 11 个阿尔茨海默病的新易感性位点。
Nat Genet. 2013 Dec;45(12):1452-8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802. Epub 2013 Oct 27.