School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 10;15(8):1711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081711.
Health literacy is an important determinant of health, and is one of the key indicators of a healthy city. Developing and improving methods to measure health literacy is prudent and necessary. This review summarizes the findings of published tools for assessing health literacy among the general population to provide a reference for establishing health literacy assessment tools in the future. In this systematic review, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were used to search articles regarding tools for assessing health literacy among the general population published up to 10 January 2018. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality assessment of methodology, and data extraction according to preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality assessment of the research was examined with the use of the specifications of the reporting guidelines for survey research (SURGE). Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria. All included instruments in monitoring the health literacy of the general population were presented through the form of questionnaires. The multistage process of making all the scales generally involved the following steps: item development, pre-testing, and evaluation of readability. However, the specific methods were different. Internal consistency for all the instruments was acceptable but with weak consistency among the subscales for some instruments. Most of the identified instruments derived from the definition of health literacy or were based on existing health literacy theory. Approximately 30% of the performed studies provided no description of the important features specified in the SURGE. This review indicates a trend in the increasing tools for assessing the health literacy of the general population by using multidimensional structures and comprehensive measurement approaches. However, no clear "consensus" was observed in the dimensions of health literacy tools.
健康素养是健康的重要决定因素,也是健康城市的关键指标之一。开发和改进健康素养的测量方法是谨慎和必要的。本综述总结了已发表的用于评估一般人群健康素养的工具的发现,为今后建立健康素养评估工具提供参考。在这项系统评价中,我们使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 检索了截至 2018 年 1 月 10 日发表的用于评估一般人群健康素养的工具的文章。两名研究人员根据预设的纳入和排除标准,独立进行文献筛选、方法学质量评估和数据提取。使用调查研究报告规范(SURGE)的规范来检查研究质量。有 11 篇文章符合纳入标准。所有用于监测一般人群健康素养的工具都以问卷的形式呈现。所有量表的多阶段制作过程通常包括以下步骤:项目开发、预测试和可读性评估。然而,具体方法有所不同。所有工具的内部一致性都是可以接受的,但对于一些工具的子量表的一致性较弱。确定的大多数工具都源于健康素养的定义或基于现有的健康素养理论。大约 30%的研究没有描述 SURGE 中指定的重要特征。本综述表明,使用多维结构和综合测量方法评估一般人群健康素养的工具越来越多。然而,在健康素养工具的维度方面,并没有观察到明显的“共识”。