Taylor Dominic M, Fraser Simon D S, Bradley J Andrew, Bradley Clare, Draper Heather, Metcalfe Wendy, Oniscu Gabriel C, Tomson Charles R V, Ravanan Rommel, Roderick Paul J
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Richard Bright Renal Service, North Bristol National Health Service Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):1070-1084. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12921216. Epub 2017 May 9.
The self-management and decision-making skills required to manage CKD successfully may be diminished in those with low health literacy. A 2012 review identified five papers reporting the prevalence of limited health literacy in CKD, largely from United States dialysis populations. The literature has expanded considerably since.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used systematic review, pooled prevalence analysis, metaregression, and exploration of heterogeneity in studies of patients with CKD (all stages).
From 433 studies, 15 new studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed together with five studies from the 2012 review. These included 13 cross-sectional surveys, five cohort studies (using baseline data), and two using baseline clinical trial data. Most (19 of 20) were from the United States. In total, 12,324 patients were studied (3529 nondialysis CKD, 5289 dialysis, 2560 transplant, and 946 with unspecified CKD; median =198.5; IQR, 128.5-260 per study). Median prevalence of limited health literacy within studies was 23% (IQR, 16%-33%), and pooled prevalence was 25% (95% confidence interval, 20% to 30%) with significant between-study heterogeneity (=97%). Pooled prevalence of limited health literacy was 25% (95% confidence interval, 16% to 33%; =97%) among patients with CKD not on dialysis, 27% (95% confidence interval, 19% to 35%; =96%) among patients on dialysis, and 14% (95% confidence interval, 7% to 21%; =97%) among patients with transplants. A higher proportion of nonwhite participants was associated with increased limited health literacy prevalence (=0.04), but participant age was not (=0.40). Within studies, nonwhite ethnicity and low socioeconomic status were consistently and independently associated with limited health literacy. Studies were of low or moderate quality. Within-study participant selection criteria had potential to introduce bias.
Limited health literacy is common in CKD, especially among individuals with low socioeconomic status and nonwhite ethnicity. This has implications for the design of self-management and decision-making initiatives to promote equity of care and improve quality. Lower prevalence among patients with transplants may reflect selection of patients with higher health literacy for transplantation either because of less comorbidity in this group or as a direct effect of health literacy on access to transplantation.
健康素养较低的人群成功管理慢性肾脏病(CKD)所需的自我管理和决策技能可能会有所下降。2012年的一项综述确定了五篇报告CKD患者健康素养有限患病率的论文,这些研究大多来自美国透析人群。自那以后,相关文献有了显著增加。
设计、研究地点、参与者及测量方法:我们对CKD(所有阶段)患者的研究进行了系统综述、合并患病率分析、元回归分析以及异质性探索。
从433项研究中,有15项新研究符合纳入标准,并与2012年综述中的五项研究一起进行了分析。这些研究包括13项横断面调查、五项队列研究(使用基线数据)以及两项使用基线临床试验数据的研究。大多数(20项中的19项)来自美国。总共对12324名患者进行了研究(3529名非透析CKD患者、5289名透析患者、2560名移植患者以及946名CKD情况未明确说明的患者;每项研究的中位数=198.5;四分位间距,128.5 - 260)。各研究中健康素养有限的中位数患病率为23%(四分位间距,16% - 33%),合并患病率为25%(95%置信区间,20%至30%),研究间存在显著异质性(I² = 97%)。未接受透析的CKD患者中健康素养有限的合并患病率为25%(95%置信区间,16%至33%;I² = 97%),透析患者中为27%(95%置信区间,19%至35%;I² = 96%),移植患者中为14%(95%置信区间,7%至21%;I² = 97%)。非白人参与者比例较高与健康素养有限患病率增加相关(P = 0.04),但参与者年龄无关(P = 0.40)。在各项研究中,非白人种族和低社会经济地位始终且独立地与健康素养有限相关。研究质量为低或中等。研究内参与者选择标准有可能引入偏差。
健康素养有限在CKD中很常见,尤其是在社会经济地位低和非白人种族的个体中。这对旨在促进医疗公平和提高质量的自我管理和决策举措的设计具有启示意义。移植患者中患病率较低可能反映了由于该组合并症较少或健康素养对获得移植的直接影响,从而选择了健康素养较高的患者进行移植。