Warren Elizabeth, McEwen Emma Suvi, Call Josep
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325418. eCollection 2025.
Non-human primates engage in complex collective behaviours, but existing research does not paint a clear picture of what individuals cognitively represent when they act together. This study investigates chimpanzees' capacity for co-representation. If individuals represent others' actions as they relate to their own during a collaborative task, they should more easily learn to reproduce that action when their roles are switched. In a between-subjects design, we trained ten chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a sequential task, in which the first action is performed by either a human partner or a non-social object, and the second action is performed by the subject. We then imposed a breakdown in the action sequence, in which subjects could perform both actions themselves, but received no help from the experimenter or object. We measured subjects' success in reproducing the first action in the sequence, as well as their attempts to recruit the experimenter's help using requesting gestures. We found no overall difference in subjects' ability to perform the first action in the sequence, but we observed significant qualitative differences in their solutions: individuals in the partnered condition replicated the experimenter's action, while those in the non-social condition achieved the same end using alternative methods. This difference in solution style could indicate that only those chimpanzees in the partnered condition mentally represented the experimenter's action during the collaborative task. We caution, however, that given the small number of subjects who solved the task, this result could also be driven by individual differences. We also found that subjects consistently produced communicative gestures toward the experimenter, but were more likely to do so after exhausting all actions they could take alone. We suggest that these patterns of behaviour highlight a number of key empirical considerations for the study of coordination in non-human primates.
非人类灵长类动物会参与复杂的集体行为,但现有研究并未清晰描绘出个体在共同行动时的认知表现。本研究调查了黑猩猩的共同表征能力。如果个体在协作任务中能将他人的行动与自己的行动联系起来进行表征,那么当角色互换时,它们应该更容易学会重现该行动。在一项被试间设计中,我们对十只黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)进行了一项序列任务训练,其中第一个行动由人类伙伴或非社会性物体执行,第二个行动由被试执行。然后我们打乱了行动序列,此时被试可以自己执行两个行动,但得不到实验者或物体的帮助。我们测量了被试在重现序列中第一个行动时的成功率,以及它们使用请求手势寻求实验者帮助的尝试次数。我们发现被试在执行序列中第一个行动的能力上没有总体差异,但在它们的解决方式上观察到了显著的质性差异:处于有伙伴条件下的个体复制了实验者的行动,而处于非社会性条件下的个体则使用其他方法达到了相同的目的。这种解决方式的差异可能表明,只有那些处于有伙伴条件下的黑猩猩在协作任务中在心理上表征了实验者的行动。然而,我们提醒,鉴于解决该任务的被试数量较少,这一结果也可能是由个体差异导致的。我们还发现被试一直向实验者做出交流手势,但在独自尝试完所有能采取的行动后更有可能这样做。我们认为这些行为模式突出了在研究非人类灵长类动物的协调时的一些关键实证考量。