Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;23(12):2314-2323. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0201-7. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Despite widespread use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in clinical practice, its mechanisms with respect to brain networks remain sparsely described. In this study, we applied tools from graph theory and network science to better understand the transdiagnostic neural mechanisms of this treatment for depression. A sample of 64 subjects was included in a study of network dynamics: 33 patients (15 MDD, 18 PTSD) received longitudinal fMRI resting state scans before and after 12 weeks of CBT. Depression severity was rated on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Thirty-one healthy controls were included to determine baseline network roles. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted on the normalized change scores of within- and between-system connectivity and normalized change score of the MADRS. Penalized regression was used to select a sparse set of predictors in a data-driven manner. Univariate analyses showed greater symptom reduction was associated with an increased functional role of the Ventral Attention (VA) system as an incohesive provincial system (decreased between- and decreased within-system connectivity). Multivariate analyses selected between-system connectivity of the VA system as the most prominent feature associated with depression improvement. Observed VA system changes are interesting in light of brain controllability descriptions: attentional control systems, including the VA system, fall on the boundary between-network communities, and facilitate integration or segregation of diverse cognitive systems. Thus, increasing segregation of the VA system following CBT (decreased between-network connectivity) may result in less contribution of emotional attention to cognitive processes, thereby potentially improving cognitive control.
尽管认知行为疗法(CBT)在临床实践中得到了广泛应用,但它在脑网络方面的机制仍描述得很少。在这项研究中,我们应用图论和网络科学的工具来更好地理解这种治疗抑郁症的跨诊断神经机制。一个由 64 名受试者组成的样本被纳入了一项网络动力学研究:33 名患者(15 名 MDD,18 名 PTSD)在接受 12 周 CBT 治疗前后接受了纵向 fMRI 静息态扫描。抑郁严重程度采用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)进行评定。纳入 31 名健康对照者以确定基线网络角色。对内在系统和外在系统的连接性以及 MADRS 的标准化变化得分的归一化变化得分进行了单变量和多变量回归分析。使用惩罚回归以数据驱动的方式选择稀疏的预测因子集。单变量分析表明,症状减轻与腹侧注意(VA)系统作为不连贯的省会系统的功能作用增加有关(内在系统和外在系统的连接性均减少)。多变量分析选择了 VA 系统的外在系统连接性作为与抑郁改善最相关的特征。观察到的 VA 系统变化与大脑可控性描述有关:包括 VA 系统在内的注意力控制系统位于网络社区之间的边界上,并促进了不同认知系统的整合或隔离。因此,CBT 后 VA 系统的隔离增加(外在网络连接性减少)可能导致情绪注意力对认知过程的贡献减少,从而潜在地改善认知控制。