Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 14;63(1):e37. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.34.
Aberrant activity of the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) is a common theme across pharmacologic treatment efficacy prediction studies. The functioning of the SCC in psychotherapeutic interventions is relatively understudied, as are functional differences among SCC subdivisions. We conducted functional connectivity analyses (rsFC) on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, collected before and after a course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), using seeds from three SCC subdivisions.
Resting-state data were collected from unmedicated patients with current MDD (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 > 16) before and after 14-sessions of CBT monotherapy. Treatment outcome was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Rostral anterior cingulate (rACC), anterior subcallosal cingulate (aSCC), and Brodmann's area 25 (BA25) masks were used as seeds in connectivity analyses that assessed baseline rsFC and symptom severity, changes in connectivity related to symptom improvement after CBT, and prediction of treatment outcomes using whole-brain baseline connectivity.
Pretreatment BDI negatively correlated with pretreatment rACC ~ dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and aSCC ~ lateral prefrontal cortex rsFC. In a region-of-interest longitudinal analysis, rsFC between these regions increased post-treatment (p < 0.05FDR). In whole-brain analyses, BA25 ~ paracentral lobule and rACC ~ paracentral lobule connectivities decreased post-treatment. Whole-brain baseline rsFC with SCC did not predict clinical improvement.
rsFC features of rACC and aSCC, but not BA25, correlated inversely with baseline depression severity, and increased following CBT. Subdivisions of SCC involved in top-down emotion regulation may be more involved in cognitive interventions, while BA25 may be more informative for interventions targeting bottom-up processing. Results emphasize the importance of subdividing the SCC in connectivity analyses.
下扣带皮层(SCC)的异常活动是药物治疗效果预测研究中的一个共同主题。SCC 在心理治疗干预中的作用相对研究较少,SCC 细分部分之间的功能差异也是如此。我们对接受认知行为治疗(CBT)的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据进行了功能连接分析(rsFC),使用了 SCC 三个细分部分的种子。
对当前患有 MDD(汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17>16)且未服用药物的患者进行静息状态数据采集,在接受 14 次 CBT 单一治疗前后进行。使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估治疗效果。使用额前扣带(rACC)、前下扣带(aSCC)和布罗德曼区 25(BA25)的掩模作为连接分析的种子,以评估基线 rsFC 与症状严重程度、CBT 后与症状改善相关的连接变化,以及使用全脑基线连接对治疗结果进行预测。
预处理 BDI 与预处理 rACC背外侧前额叶皮质和 aSCC外侧前额叶皮质 rsFC 呈负相关。在感兴趣区的纵向分析中,这些区域之间的 rsFC 在治疗后增加(p<0.05FDR)。在全脑分析中,rACC旁中央叶和 aSCC旁中央叶的 rsFC 在治疗后减少。SCC 与全脑基线 rsFC 不能预测临床改善。
rACC 和 aSCC 的 rsFC 特征,但不是 BA25,与基线抑郁严重程度呈负相关,且在 CBT 后增加。涉及自上而下情绪调节的 SCC 细分可能更多地参与认知干预,而 BA25 可能更能为针对自下而上处理的干预提供信息。研究结果强调了在连接分析中细分 SCC 的重要性。