Truelove-Hill Monica, Erickson Brian A, Anderson Julia, Kossoyan Mary, Kounios John
Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 30;9:1311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01311. eCollection 2018.
Research based on construal level theory (CLT) suggests that thinking about the distant future can prime people to solve problems by insight (i.e., an "aha" moment) while thinking about the near future can prime them to solve problems analytically. In this study, we used a novel method to elucidate the time-course of temporal priming effects on creative problem solving. Specifically, we used growth-curve analysis (GCA) to examine the time-course of priming while participants solved a series of brief verbal problems. Participants were tested in two counterbalanced sessions in a within-subject experimental design; one session featured near-future priming and the other featured far-future priming. Our results suggest high-level construal may temporarily enhance analytical thinking; far-future priming caused transient facilitation of analytical solving while near-future priming induced weaker, transient facilitation of insightful solving. However, this effect is short-lived; priming produced no significant differences in the total number of insights and analytical solutions. Given the fleeting nature of these effects, future studies should consider implementing methodology that allows for aspects of the time-course of priming effects to be examined. A method such as GCA may reveal mild effects that would be otherwise missed using other types of analyses.
基于解释水平理论(CLT)的研究表明,思考遥远的未来会促使人们通过顿悟(即“啊哈”时刻)来解决问题,而思考近期未来则会促使人们通过分析来解决问题。在本研究中,我们采用了一种新颖的方法来阐明时间启动效应在创造性问题解决中的时间进程。具体而言,我们使用增长曲线分析(GCA)来考察启动的时间进程,同时让参与者解决一系列简短的语言问题。在一项被试内实验设计中,参与者在两个平衡的阶段接受测试;一个阶段采用近期未来启动,另一个阶段采用遥远未来启动。我们的结果表明,高水平的解释可能会暂时增强分析性思维;遥远未来启动会短暂促进分析性解决,而近期未来启动会诱导较弱的、短暂的顿悟式解决促进。然而,这种效应是短暂的;启动在顿悟和分析性解决方案的总数上没有产生显著差异。鉴于这些效应的短暂性,未来的研究应考虑采用能够考察启动效应时间进程各个方面的方法。像GCA这样的方法可能会揭示出使用其他类型分析会错过的轻微效应。