Lim Jae-Hyung, Kim Chang-Ki, Bae Mi Hyun
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanynag University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Yongin, Korea.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jan;33(1):e22645. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22645. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Rapid discrimination between Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is critical for patient treatment and to avoid unnecessary expenditure on infection control. Because real-time PCR assays distinguish MTB from NTM, we evaluated the performance of two real-time PCR assays (AdvanSure and PowerChek).
This study used 143 DNA samples from respiratory specimens which were collected based on routine PCR results using Anyplex kit. A total of 87 positive samples (65 MTB and 22 NTM) and 56 negative samples were collected consecutively during 6 months and 1 month, respectively. The diagnostic performance of PCR assays (AdvanSure and PowerChek) was retrospectively analyzed based on the results of conventional mycobacterial tests and routine PCR assay.
Based on culture results, the sensitivities/specificities of AdvanSure and PowerChek were 90.7%/87.6% and 92.6%/85.4%, respectively, for MTB detection. For PCR-positive specimens, the quantification cycle (Cq) values of smear-negative specimens were higher than those of the smear-positive specimens (P < 0.001). As expected, the two PCR assays had the same sensitivities for NTM detection, viz. 90.0%, and their specificities were 99.2% and 98.4%, respectively. The overall agreement rate between the three PCR assays was 96.5% for MTB and 97.9% for NTM.
The sensitivities of PCR assays in our study might be overestimated, because this study enrolled relatively lower number of PCR-negative samples which potentially missed PCR-negative but culture-positive specimens. However, the two real-time PCR assays for detecting MTB and NTM perform equally well in relative performance evaluation and their Cq values can be considered suitable for predicting smear-positive specimens.
快速鉴别结核分枝杆菌(MTB)和非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)对于患者治疗以及避免在感染控制方面的不必要支出至关重要。由于实时荧光定量PCR检测可区分MTB和NTM,我们评估了两种实时荧光定量PCR检测方法(AdvanSure和PowerChek)的性能。
本研究使用了143份来自呼吸道标本的DNA样本,这些样本是根据使用Anyplex试剂盒的常规PCR结果收集的。在6个月和1个月期间,分别连续收集了87份阳性样本(65份MTB和22份NTM)和56份阴性样本。基于传统分枝杆菌检测和常规PCR检测结果,对PCR检测方法(AdvanSure和PowerChek)的诊断性能进行了回顾性分析。
基于培养结果,AdvanSure和PowerChek检测MTB的灵敏度/特异度分别为90.7%/87.6%和92.6%/85.4%。对于PCR阳性标本涂片阴性标本的定量循环(Cq)值高于涂片阳性标本(P<0.001)。正如预期的那样,两种PCR检测方法检测NTM的灵敏度相同,即90.0%,其特异度分别为99.2%和98.4%。三种PCR检测方法之间的总体一致性率对于MTB为96.5%,对于NTM为97.9%。
我们研究中PCR检测方法的灵敏度可能被高估了,因为本研究纳入的PCR阴性样本数量相对较少可能遗漏了PCR阴性但培养阳性的标本。然而,这两种用于检测MTB和NTM的实时荧光定量PCR检测方法在相对性能评估中表现同样良好,并且它们的Cq值可被认为适合预测涂片阳性标本。