Department of Philosophy and Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Institut Jean Nicod, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;10(2):e1481. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1481. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Ten years ago, one of us proposed a dynamic hierarchical model of intentions that brought together philosophical work on intentions and empirical work on motor representations and motor control (Pacherie, 2008). The model distinguished among Distal intentions, Proximal intentions, and Motor intentions operating at different levels of action control (hence the name DPM model). This model specified the representational and functional profiles of each type of intention, as well their local and global dynamics, and the ways in which they interact. A core insight of the model was that action control is the result of integrated, coordinated activity across these levels of intention. Since the proposal of the model, empirical and theoretical works in philosophy and cognitive science have emerged that would seem to support and expand on this central insight. In particular, an updated understanding of the nature of sensorimotor processing and motor representations, as well as of how the different levels of intention and control interface and interact, allows for the further specification and precisification of the original DPM model. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Psychological Capacities Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Philosophy > Action.
十年前，我们中的一位提出了一个动态的意向层级模型，它结合了意向的哲学工作和运动表现和运动控制的实证工作（Pacherie，2008）。该模型区分了远距离意向、近距离意向和在不同的动作控制水平上运作的运动意向（因此称为 DPM 模型）。该模型指定了每种意向类型的表示和功能特征，以及它们的局部和全局动态，以及它们相互作用的方式。该模型的一个核心观点是，动作控制是这些意向水平上整合协调的活动的结果。自模型提出以来，哲学和认知科学领域中的实证和理论工作似乎支持并扩展了这一核心观点。特别是，对感觉运动处理和运动表现的本质以及不同意向和控制水平的接口和相互作用方式的更新理解，使得对原始 DPM 模型进行进一步的细化和精确化成为可能。本文属于以下分类：哲学>心理能力心理学>运动技能和表现哲学>行动。
