Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚、奥地利、比利时、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、加拿大、德国、日本、科索沃、瑞士、荷兰、泰国、美国临床药学服务的发展及其与教育标准、研究水平和实施情况的相关性

Development of clinical pharmacy services in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Canada, Germany, Japan, Kosovo, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Thailand, USA and correlation with educational standards, level of research, and implemen.

作者信息

Rose Olaf, Derendorf Hartmut, Erzkamp Susanne, Fujita Kenji, Hartl Alexander, Hoti Kreshnik, Krass Ines, Obarcanin Emina, Saevels Jan, Srimongkon Pornchanok, Teichert Martina, Tsuyuki Ross T

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Nov;56(11):518-530. doi: 10.5414/CP203264.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare determinants of professional development between different countries to identify barriers and facilitators of development towards clinical pharmacy services and stimulate discussion of under-used potential and opportunities.

MATERIALS

The study was conceived as a survey. The questionnaire was administered to a group of experts.

METHODS

The survey was conducted as a cross-sectional study with descriptive and correlation analysis. A questionnaire was developed and adjusted to the study focus, covering aspects on general regulations for community pharmacies, professional education, implementation of clinical pharmacy services, and research in patient care. Results were compared for analyses.

RESULTS

A total of twelve countries were included in this survey. Pharmacy studies took between 4 and 6 years plus residency in most countries. Curricula remained drug-oriented only in Austria, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Germany; these three countries had the least pharmacotherapy content in their curricula. Canada, the USA, and Australia have established clinical pharmacy services in almost all fields of practice. Most other countries have implemented at least some clinical services, with the exception of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Germany, and Kosovo. The correlation coefficient between education, research, and implementation was 0.91.

CONCLUSION: The results of the survey show that clinical pharmacy services are established to very different extents among the participating countries. The strong correlation suggests that achieving a successful transition in professional practice needs to address several aspects of education and research to reach progress. The collected data might help to identify potential areas of improvement to foster implementation of clinical pharmacy services.
.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较不同国家专业发展的决定因素,以确定临床药学服务发展的障碍和促进因素,并激发对未充分利用的潜力和机会的讨论。

材料

本研究被设计为一项调查。问卷被发放给一组专家。

方法

该调查作为一项横断面研究进行,采用描述性和相关性分析。开发并调整了一份问卷以聚焦于研究内容,涵盖社区药房的一般规定、专业教育、临床药学服务的实施以及患者护理研究等方面。对结果进行比较分析。

结果

本调查共纳入了12个国家。在大多数国家,药学学习需要4至6年再加上住院实习。只有奥地利、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那以及德国的课程仍然仅以药物为导向;这三个国家的课程中药物治疗内容最少。加拿大、美国和澳大利亚在几乎所有实践领域都建立了临床药学服务。除波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、德国和科索沃外,大多数其他国家至少实施了一些临床服务。教育、研究和实施之间的相关系数为0.91。

结论

调查结果表明,参与调查的国家在临床药学服务的建立程度上差异很大。强烈的相关性表明,要在专业实践中实现成功转型,需要在教育和研究的几个方面取得进展。收集的数据可能有助于确定潜在的改进领域,以促进临床药学服务的实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验