Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 May;37(5):873-878. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
Availability of anti-viral agents and need to isolate infected patients increases the need to confirm the diagnosis of influenza before determining patient disposition.
We sought to determine if time-to-disposition (TTD) was shorter among patients tested for influenza using an Emergency Department (ED) Point-of-care (POC) test compared to core laboratory (lab) test and to determine difference in antibiotic use between groups.
We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients for whom influenza testing was ordered during influenza season 2017. Participants were randomized to POC or lab. Data collected included demographics, chief complaint, influenza test results, turnaround time (TAT), whether antibiotics were given, and TTD. Descriptive statistics were calculated and group comparisons conducted using chi squared and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.
Study population included 100 in the POC group and 97 in the lab group. Demographics were similar between POC and lab participants. More flu positive results were reported in the POC group compared to the lab group (51.0% vs. 33.0% p = 0.01). The median TTD was 146.5 min (IQR 98.5) for POC group and 165.5 min (IQR 127) for lab group (p = 0.26). The median TAT was 30.5 min (IQR 7.5) for POC group and 106.0 min (IQR 55) for core lab group (p = 0.001). Antibiotics were given to 14.0% of POC participants and 14.4% of lab participants (p = 0.93).
Although use of a POC influenza test provided more rapid TAT than use of a core lab test, there was no significant difference in TTD or antibiotic use between groups.
抗病毒药物的可及性和隔离感染患者的需求增加了在确定患者处置方案之前确认流感诊断的必要性。
我们旨在确定与使用核心实验室(lab)检测相比,在急诊部(ED)即时检测(POC)检测中检测流感的患者的处置时间(TTD)是否更短,并确定两组之间抗生素使用的差异。
我们前瞻性地招募了 2017 年流感季节期间流感检测呈阳性的 ED 患者作为方便样本。参与者被随机分配到 POC 组或 lab 组。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、主要诉求、流感检测结果、周转时间(TAT)、是否使用抗生素以及 TTD。计算描述性统计数据,并使用卡方检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验进行组间比较。
研究人群包括 POC 组 100 例和 lab 组 97 例。POC 和 lab 组参与者的人口统计学特征相似。与 lab 组相比,POC 组报告的流感阳性结果更多(51.0% vs. 33.0%,p=0.01)。POC 组的中位 TTD 为 146.5 分钟(IQR 98.5),而 lab 组为 165.5 分钟(IQR 127)(p=0.26)。POC 组的中位 TAT 为 30.5 分钟(IQR 7.5),而核心 lab 组为 106.0 分钟(IQR 55)(p=0.001)。POC 组有 14.0%的参与者和 lab 组有 14.4%的参与者使用了抗生素(p=0.93)。
尽管使用 POC 流感检测比使用核心 lab 检测提供了更快的 TAT,但两组之间的 TTD 或抗生素使用没有显著差异。