Suppr超能文献

一种新型基于 PCR 的即时检测方法可实现流感病毒感染的快速、高效和敏感诊断。

A novel PCR-based point-of-care method facilitates rapid, efficient, and sensitive diagnosis of influenza virus infection.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Aug;25(8):1032-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.017. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this single-centre study was the comparative analysis of the GeneXpert (Cepheid Inc.) and the LIAT (Roche) system for the rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection of influenza A (IA) and influenza B (IB) viruses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the 2017-2018 flu season, 651 prospectively collected samples (throat and nasal swabs) of patients with symptoms of influenza-like illness or acute respiratory infection were tested for the presence of IA and IB viruses using the GeneXpert and LIAT systems. To evaluate the usefulness for near-patient testing, a LIAT system was installed at the Department of Emergency Medicine, and sample testing was performed on site. Reference testing of all samples was performed with the Xpert Flu assay and for 313 samples in addition with the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) assay at the central laboratory. Analysis of all samples was carried out within 24 hr after collection.

RESULTS

Overall, 267 of the 651 samples analysed were positive for influenza viruses in at least one of the three assays investigated (IA, 88; IB, 179). The overall rates of agreement between the LIAT assay and the Xpert Flu assay was 96.0% for the detection of IA and IB viruses. The sensitivity and specificity of the LIAT assay compared to the Xpert Flu assay for the detection of IA was 98.80% (95% confidence interval (CI) 93.47-99.97%) and 99.12% (95% CI, 97.96% to 99.71%) and for the detection of IB 98.76% (95% CI 95.58-99.85%), and 96.33% (95% CI 94.26-97.81%), respectively. The LIAT assay showed a statistically significant higher detection rate of IB virus than the Xpert Flu assay (p <0.01). No significant difference was found between the detection rate of the LIAT assay and the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV assay. The mean time to the availability of a definite test result was significantly shorter with the on-site LIAT system than the GeneXpert system (mean 59 min saving time; p <0.01).

CONCLUSION

The LIAT system represents a robust and highly sensitive point-of-care device for the rapid PCR-based detection of influenza A and influenza B viruses.

摘要

目的

本单中心研究旨在对比分析 GeneXpert(Cepheid Inc.)和 LIAT(罗氏)系统在快速聚合酶链反应(PCR)基础上检测甲型流感(IA)和乙型流感(IB)病毒中的应用。

患者和方法

在 2017-2018 年流感季节,对 651 例有流感样症状或急性呼吸道感染症状的患者前瞻性采集的样本(咽喉和鼻腔拭子)进行检测,使用 GeneXpert 和 LIAT 系统检测 IA 和 IB 病毒的存在情况。为评估其在近患者检测中的应用价值,在急诊医学科安装了一个 LIAT 系统,并在现场进行样本检测。所有样本的参考检测均采用 Xpert Flu 检测,另外 313 个样本在中心实验室采用 Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV(呼吸道合胞病毒)检测进行。采集后 24 小时内对所有样本进行分析。

结果

总体而言,在至少一种三种检测方法中,651 个分析样本中 267 个为流感病毒阳性(IA,88;IB,179)。LIAT 检测与 Xpert Flu 检测在检测 IA 和 IB 病毒方面的总符合率为 96.0%。LIAT 检测与 Xpert Flu 检测相比,IA 检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 98.80%(95%置信区间[CI]93.47-99.97%)和 99.12%(95% CI 97.96%-99.71%),IB 检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 98.76%(95% CI 95.58%-99.85%)和 96.33%(95% CI 94.26%-97.81%)。LIAT 检测在检测 IB 病毒方面的检出率明显高于 Xpert Flu 检测(p<0.01)。LIAT 检测与 Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV 检测的检出率无统计学差异。与 GeneXpert 系统相比,现场使用的 LIAT 系统得出明确检测结果的平均时间明显缩短(平均节省 59 分钟;p<0.01)。

结论

LIAT 系统是一种快速、基于 PCR 的检测甲型流感和乙型流感病毒的可靠、高度敏感的即时检测设备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验