Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.
Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Dec;17(4):e671-e678. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Previous studies have shown that variability in molecular markers correlates with poorer survival outcomes in patients with right-sided colon cancer (RCC) compared with left-sided colon cancer (LCC). However, several studies have shown conflicting results when examined stage for stage. We examined RCC and LCC to assess for differences in histopathologic features and overall survival (OS).
The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with RCC and LCC from 2004 to 2013. A propensity-adjusted analysis evaluating the association between the primary site and OS was performed.
Of the 422,443 patients identified, 54.7% had RCC and 45.3% had LCC. For all stages, the patients with RCC were older, had more poorly differentiated tumors, and had a greater degree of microsatellite instability compared with those with LCC. Patients with RCC also had more KRAS mutations than did those with LCC. RCC patients had poorer 3- and 5-year OS at all stages, especially stage 3 (62% vs. 73% and 50% vs. 62%, respectively; P < .001). The median OS was 77.5 months for LCC and 62.3 months for RCC (P < .001).
The present study is one of the largest studies demonstrating that RCC and LCC are different biologic entities. Patients with RCC had significantly greater rates of microsatellite instability for all stages, which has been previously shown to be prognostically advantageous. However, the results of the present study showed poorer OS at every disease stage for RCC compared with LCC. These factors have important implications for the further use of targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced colon cancer.
先前的研究表明,与左侧结肠癌(LCC)相比,右侧结肠癌(RCC)患者的分子标志物变异性与较差的生存结果相关。然而,当按阶段进行检查时,几项研究显示出相互矛盾的结果。我们检查了 RCC 和 LCC,以评估组织病理学特征和总生存期(OS)的差异。
使用国家癌症数据库(National Cancer Database)从 2004 年至 2013 年确定 RCC 和 LCC 患者。进行了倾向调整分析,以评估主要部位与 OS 之间的关联。
在确定的 422,443 名患者中,54.7%为 RCC,45.3%为 LCC。在所有阶段,RCC 患者年龄较大,肿瘤分化程度较差,微卫星不稳定性程度较高,与 LCC 患者相比。与 LCC 患者相比,RCC 患者的 KRAS 突变更多。在所有阶段,尤其是在第 3 阶段,RCC 患者的 3 年和 5 年 OS 较差(分别为 62%比 73%和 50%比 62%;P<.001)。LCC 的中位 OS 为 77.5 个月,RCC 为 62.3 个月(P<.001)。
本研究是最大的研究之一,证明 RCC 和 LCC 是不同的生物学实体。对于所有阶段,RCC 患者的微卫星不稳定性率明显更高,先前已证明这与预后有利。然而,本研究的结果显示 RCC 与 LCC 相比,在每个疾病阶段的 OS 都较差。这些因素对进一步使用靶向治疗治疗晚期结肠癌具有重要意义。