Miller Eric, Vikram Amit, Agga Getahun E, Arthur Terrance M, Schmidt John W
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska United States Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center , Nebraska.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2018 Nov;15(11):689-697. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2475. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
Approximately 20% of U.S. beef cattle receive prophylactic in-feed administration of chlortetracycline (CTC) to reduce bovine respiratory disease (BRD) incidence during the transition into feedlots. To determine the impact of prophylaxis on selected antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), 300 beef cattle were placed into 10 pens (30 head/pen). Five "CTC group" pens received in-feed CTC (10 mg/lb of body weight/d) from the fifth to ninth day after feedlot arrival, whereas the five "Control group" pens received no CTC. Fecal swabs and pen surface materials were collected for metagenomic DNA isolation on five sample occasions: arrival at the feedlot, 5 d posttreatment (dpt), and 27, 75, and 117 dpt. For each sample occasion, fecal samples and pen surface material samples were pooled by pen. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to determine the abundances of 10 ARGs. Due to low detection percentages (%D) and quantification percentages (%Q), the abundances of five ARGs were not analyzed: aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'') (%D = 43%, %Q = 4%), bla (%D = 41%, %Q = 0%), bla (%D = 0%, %Q = 0%), bla (%D = 21%, %Q = 16%), and mecA (%D = 4%, %Q = 0%). The %D and %Q for the ARGs aadA1, erm(B), tet(A), tet(B), and tet(M) were ≥98% and ≥90%, respectively. The abundances of aadA1, erm(B), tet(A), tet(B), and tet(M) resistance genes did not differ (p > 0.05) between the CTC and control groups at any sampling time for feces or pen surface material. Although only 10 ARGs were examined in this study, the results suggest that a single 5-d in-feed CTC prophylaxis of beef cattle to prevent BRD has a negligible impact on the abundances of ARGs.
大约20%的美国肉牛在转入饲养场期间接受预防性的饲料中添加金霉素(CTC),以降低牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)的发病率。为了确定预防性用药对选定的抗菌药物耐药基因(ARG)的影响,将300头肉牛放入10个围栏中(每围栏30头)。五个“CTC组”围栏在到达饲养场后的第五天至第九天接受饲料中添加的CTC(10毫克/磅体重/天),而五个“对照组”围栏不接受CTC。在五个采样时间点采集粪便拭子和围栏表面材料用于宏基因组DNA分离:到达饲养场时、处理后5天(dpt)、以及处理后27、75和117天。对于每个采样时间点,粪便样本和围栏表面材料样本按围栏合并。使用定量聚合酶链反应来确定10种ARG的丰度。由于检测百分比(%D)和定量百分比(%Q)较低,未分析5种ARG的丰度:aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')(%D = 43%,%Q = 4%)、bla(%D = 41%,%Q = 0%)、bla(%D = 0%,%Q = 0%)、bla(%D = 21%,%Q = 16%)和mecA(%D = 4%,%Q = 0%)。ARG aadA1、erm(B)、tet(A)、tet(B)和tet(M)的%D和%Q分别≥98%和≥90%。在粪便或围栏表面材料的任何采样时间,CTC组和对照组之间aadA1、erm(B)、tet(A)、tet(B)和tet(M)耐药基因的丰度没有差异(p > 0.05)。尽管本研究仅检测了10种ARG,但结果表明,肉牛单次5天的饲料中添加CTC预防BRD对ARG丰度的影响可忽略不计。