Suppr超能文献

5.0% 利非司特滴眼液的安全性和耐受性:干眼疾病五项随机对照试验的汇总分析

Safety and tolerability of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0%: Pooled analysis of five randomized controlled trials in dry eye disease.

作者信息

Nichols Kelly K, Donnenfeld Eric D, Karpecki Paul M, Hovanesian John A, Raychaudhuri Aparna, Shojaei Amir, Zhang Steven

机构信息

1 School of Optometry, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

2 Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Garden City, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;29(4):394-401. doi: 10.1177/1120672118791936. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Characterize the safety and tolerability of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% for the treatment of dry eye disease.

METHODS

Pooled data from five randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Key inclusion criteria were adults with dry eye disease (Schirmer tear test score ⩾1 and ⩽10 mm, eye dryness score ⩾40 (visual analog scale 0-100), corneal staining score ⩾2.0 (0-4 scale)). Participants were randomized to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% or placebo twice daily for 84 or 360 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events and drop comfort scores were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 2464 participants (lifitegrast, n = 1287; placebo, n = 1177) were included. Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in >5% in either group were instillation site irritation (lifitegrast, 15.2%; placebo, 2.8%), instillation site reaction (lifitegrast, 12.3%; placebo, 2.3%), and instillation site pain (lifitegrast, 9.8%; placebo, 2.1%); the most common (> 5%) nonocular treatment-emergent adverse event was dysgeusia (lifitegrast, 14.5%; placebo, 0.3%). The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 7.0% (lifitegrast) versus 2.6% (placebo) of participants (ocular: 5.5% vs 1.5%; nonocular: 1.9% vs 1.1%). Drop comfort scores with lifitegrast improved within 3 min of instillation and the score at 3 min improved across visits (12-week trials (both eyes, day 84 vs 0): 2.0 vs 3.3; SONATA (day 360 vs 0): right eye, 1.2 vs 1.7; left eye, 1.2 vs 1.8).

CONCLUSION

Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% appeared to be safe and well tolerated for the treatment of dry eye disease. Drop comfort with lifitegrast improved within 3 min of instillation.

摘要

目的

评估5.0%的lifitegrast眼药水治疗干眼症的安全性和耐受性。

方法

分析来自五项随机对照试验的汇总数据。主要纳入标准为患有干眼症的成年人(泪液分泌试验评分≥1且≤10毫米,眼干评分≥40(视觉模拟评分0-100),角膜染色评分≥2.0(0-4分))。参与者被随机分为每日两次使用5.0%的lifitegrast眼药水或安慰剂,持续84或360天。评估治疗期间出现的不良事件和滴眼液舒适度评分。

结果

总体而言,共纳入2464名参与者(lifitegrast组,n = 1287;安慰剂组,n = 1177)。两组中发生率超过5%的眼部治疗期间出现的不良事件为滴眼部位刺激(lifitegrast组,15.2%;安慰剂组,2.8%)、滴眼部位反应(lifitegrast组,12.3%;安慰剂组,2.3%)和滴眼部位疼痛(lifitegrast组,9.8%;安慰剂组,2.1%);最常见的(>5%)非眼部治疗期间出现的不良事件是味觉障碍(lifitegrast组,14.5%;安慰剂组,0.3%)。大多数治疗期间出现的不良事件为轻至中度。因治疗期间出现的不良事件而停药的参与者比例在lifitegrast组为7.0%,在安慰剂组为2.6%(眼部:5.5%对1.5%;非眼部:1.9%对1.1%)。使用lifitegrast后,滴眼液舒适度在滴入后3分钟内有所改善,且在各次访视中3分钟时的评分均有所提高(12周试验(双眼,第84天对第0天):2.0对3.3;SONATA试验(第360天对第0天):右眼,1.2对1.7;左眼,1.2对1.8)。

结论

5.0%的lifitegrast眼药水在治疗干眼症方面似乎安全且耐受性良好。使用lifitegrast后,滴眼液舒适度在滴入后3分钟内得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d8d/6625033/e95b2270929b/10.1177_1120672118791936-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验