• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澄清关于“风险因素”的问题:预测因素与解释因素

Clarifying questions about "risk factors": predictors versus explanation.

作者信息

Schooling C Mary, Jones Heidi E

机构信息

1Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 West 125th St, New York, NY 10027 USA.

School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China.

出版信息

Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 8;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12982-018-0080-z. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s12982-018-0080-z
PMID:30116285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6083579/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In biomedical research much effort is thought to be wasted. Recommendations for improvement have largely focused on processes and procedures. Here, we additionally suggest less ambiguity concerning the questions addressed.

METHODS

We clarify the distinction between two conflated concepts, prediction and explanation, both encompassed by the term "risk factor", and give methods and presentation appropriate for each.

RESULTS

Risk prediction studies use statistical techniques to generate contextually specific data-driven models requiring a representative sample that identify people at risk of health conditions efficiently (target populations for interventions). Risk prediction studies do not necessarily include causes (targets of intervention), but may include cheap and easy to measure surrogates or biomarkers of causes. Explanatory studies, ideally embedded within an informative model of reality, assess the role of causal factors which if targeted for interventions, are likely to improve outcomes. Predictive models allow identification of people or populations at elevated disease risk enabling targeting of proven interventions acting on causal factors. Explanatory models allow identification of causal factors to target across populations to prevent disease.

CONCLUSION

Ensuring a clear match of question to methods and interpretation will reduce research waste due to misinterpretation.

摘要

背景

在生物医学研究中,很多努力被认为是浪费的。改进建议主要集中在流程和程序上。在此,我们还建议在研究问题上减少模糊性。

方法

我们阐明了两个相互混淆的概念——预测和解释之间的区别,这两个概念都包含在“风险因素”一词中,并给出了适合每个概念的方法和呈现方式。

结果

风险预测研究使用统计技术来生成基于特定背景、由数据驱动的模型,这需要一个具有代表性的样本,以便有效地识别有健康状况风险的人群(干预的目标人群)。风险预测研究不一定包括病因(干预的目标),但可能包括病因的廉价且易于测量的替代物或生物标志物。解释性研究理想情况下应嵌入一个信息丰富的现实模型中,评估因果因素的作用,若针对这些因素进行干预,可能会改善结果。预测模型能够识别疾病风险升高的人群,从而使针对因果因素的已证实干预措施有的放矢。解释性模型能够识别跨人群的可针对的因果因素以预防疾病。

结论

确保问题与方法及解释明确匹配,将减少因误解导致的研究浪费。

相似文献

1
Clarifying questions about "risk factors": predictors versus explanation.澄清关于“风险因素”的问题:预测因素与解释因素
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 8;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12982-018-0080-z. eCollection 2018.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
5
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
COVID-19 and the epistemology of epidemiological models at the dawn of AI.人工智能时代初期的新冠疫情与流行病学模型认识论
Ann Hum Biol. 2020 Sep;47(6):506-513. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2020.1839132.
7
8
Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science.健康决策中的因果证据:因果推断方法和健康决策科学。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Dec 21;20:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/000314. eCollection 2022.
9
10
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍

引用本文的文献

1
Dementia risk reduction in China: Country-specific estimates of modifiable risk factors and population attributable fractions (PAFs).中国降低痴呆症风险:特定国家可改变风险因素及人群归因分数(PAFs)的估计
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Aug;21(8):e70542. doi: 10.1002/alz.70542.
2
Septic arthritis score (SAS) - a novel clinical prediction model for the probability of septic arthritis in the adult native knee.脓毒性关节炎评分(SAS)——一种用于预测成人原发性膝关节脓毒性关节炎概率的新型临床预测模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11306-6.
3
Conflation of prediction and causality in the TB literature.结核病文献中预测与因果关系的混淆。
IJTLD Open. 2025 Jul 9;2(7):388-396. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0142. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Variable selection for causal inference, prediction, and descriptive research: a narrative review of recommendations.因果推断、预测和描述性研究中的变量选择:建议的叙述性综述
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Jun 4;5(3):oeaf070. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf070. eCollection 2025 May.
5
On the Uses and Abuses of Regression Models: A Call for Reform of Statistical Practice and Teaching.论回归模型的用途与滥用:呼吁改革统计实践与教学
Stat Med. 2025 Jun;44(13-14):e10244. doi: 10.1002/sim.10244.
6
Dizziness and imbalance and their association with general and mental health in a community-based cross-sectional study of middle-aged individuals: the Busselton healthy ageing study.一项基于社区的中年人群横断面研究中头晕和平衡障碍及其与总体健康和心理健康的关联:巴瑟尔顿健康老龄化研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):1287. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22502-z.
7
Predictive Ability of Previous Pain and Disease Conditions on the Presentation of Post-COVID Pain in a Danish Cohort of Adult COVID-19 Survivors.丹麦成年新冠病毒病幸存者队列中既往疼痛和疾病状况对新冠后疼痛表现的预测能力
Eur J Pain. 2025 May;29(5):e70021. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70021.
8
Socioeconomic position across the life course and falls among middle- and older-aged adults: protocol for a systematic review.整个生命历程中的社会经济地位与中老年成年人的跌倒:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e087971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087971.
9
Predictors of maternal HIV acquisition during pregnancy and lactation in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区孕期和哺乳期孕产妇感染艾滋病毒的预测因素:一项系统评价和叙述性综合分析
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 3;19(12):e0314747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314747. eCollection 2024.
10
Predictors of weaning failure in ventilated intensive care patients: a systematic evidence map.机械通气重症监护患者撤机失败的预测因素:系统证据图谱。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 12;28(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05135-3.

本文引用的文献

1
CETP-Inhibition and HDL-Cholesterol: A Story of CV Risk or CV Benefit, or Both.CETP 抑制与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇:心血管风险或获益,亦或二者兼具?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;104(2):297-300. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1118. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Genetic Variants Related to Longer Telomere Length are Associated with Increased Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma.与端粒长度较长相关的遗传变异与肾细胞癌风险增加相关。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):747-754. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
3
Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality.孟德尔随机化在心血管代谢疾病中的应用:因果关系评估的挑战。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Oct;14(10):577-590. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.78. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study.端粒长度与癌症和非肿瘤性疾病风险的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):636-651. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5945.
5
Causal inference and the data-fusion problem.因果推断与数据融合问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7345-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510507113.
6
Surprises From Genetic Analyses of Lipid Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化脂质风险因素遗传分析中的意外发现。
Circ Res. 2016 Feb 19;118(4):579-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306398.
7
Concordance with known causal effects is a potential validity measure for observational studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
8
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?增加生物医学研究的价值和减少浪费:谁在倾听?
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1573-1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00307-4. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
9
Accurate Prediction and Validation of Response to Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.精准预测和验证乳腺癌对内分泌治疗的反应。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 10;33(20):2270-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.8963. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Effect on cardiovascular risk of high density lipoprotein targeted drug treatments niacin, fibrates, and CETP inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials including 117,411 patients.高密度脂蛋白靶向药物治疗烟酸、贝特类药物和胆固醇酯转运蛋白抑制剂对心血管风险的影响:纳入117411例患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2014 Jul 18;349:g4379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4379.