Suppr超能文献

儿科急诊医生能否在急诊科不借助X光片识别和处理锁骨骨折?一项前瞻性研究。

Can paediatric emergency clinicians identify and manage clavicle fractures without radiographs in the emergency department? A prospective study.

作者信息

Lirette Marie-Pier, Bailey Benoit, Grant Samuel, Jackson Michael, Leonard Paul

机构信息

Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018 Aug 10;2(1):e000304. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000304. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paediatric clavicle fractures are commonly seen in the emergency department (ED), and the current standard of care is to obtain a radiograph for all suspected clavicle fractures. We are yet to determine whether radiographs add valuable information to clinicians' assessment and therefore if they are necessary in the management of paediatric clavicle fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether clinicians can manage paediatric clavicle fractures without radiographs, first by determining the accuracy of clinicians in identifying the presence of a clavicle fracture, and second by evaluating the level of agreement (kappa (κ)) between the ultimate management of children with suspected clavicle fractures and clinicians' blinded prediction prior to the radiograph.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled patients presenting to a paediatric ED with a suspected clavicle fracture. Prior to requesting a radiograph, clinicians completed a standardised form, where they predicted the presence of a fracture and their ultimate management based on their clinical findings, and rated their confidence.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients aged 7.2±3.9 years included, 40 (80%) had a radiologically proven clavicle fracture, and clinicians were able to accurately identify them (sensitivity 93%, positive predictive value 88%). There were five (50%) patients without a radiological fracture that were treated with broad arm sling. Clinicians' prediction of ultimate management had the highest agreement with the ultimate management of the patient on leaving the ED, compared with clinicians' prediction of the presence of fracture and the final radiograph findings: κ of 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1), 0.67 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.98) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.94), respectively. Thirty-six (72%) of the clinicians felt comfortable treating without radiographs, and this was dependent on their level of training.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can identify the presence of a fracture and tend to be overconservative in their management. Despite negative radiological findings, some patients were treated as though they had a fracture, based on clinical judgement. This adds evidence that radiographs are not routinely required for uncomplicated paediatric clavicle fractures.

摘要

背景

儿科锁骨骨折在急诊科很常见,目前的护理标准是对所有疑似锁骨骨折的患者进行X光检查。我们尚未确定X光检查是否能为临床医生的评估提供有价值的信息,以及在儿科锁骨骨折的治疗中是否有必要进行X光检查。

目的

首先通过确定临床医生识别锁骨骨折存在的准确性,其次通过评估疑似锁骨骨折儿童的最终治疗与临床医生在X光检查前的盲法预测之间的一致性水平(kappa(κ)),来确定临床医生是否可以在不进行X光检查的情况下处理儿科锁骨骨折。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了因疑似锁骨骨折就诊于儿科急诊科的患者。在要求进行X光检查之前,临床医生填写一份标准化表格,根据他们的临床发现预测骨折的存在及其最终治疗方案,并对他们的信心进行评分。

结果

纳入的50例年龄为7.2±3.9岁的患者中,40例(80%)经X光检查证实有锁骨骨折,临床医生能够准确识别(敏感性93%,阳性预测值88%)。有5例(50%)X光检查未发现骨折的患者接受了宽臂吊带治疗。与临床医生对骨折存在的预测和最终X光检查结果相比,临床医生对最终治疗的预测与患者离开急诊科时的最终治疗方案一致性最高:κ分别为0.88(95%CI 0.64至1)、0.67(95%CI 0.36至0.98)和0.62(95%CI 0.30至0.94)。36名(72%)临床医生对不进行X光检查进行治疗感到放心,这取决于他们的培训水平。

结论

临床医生能够识别骨折的存在,并且在治疗上往往过于保守。尽管X光检查结果为阴性,但根据临床判断,一些患者仍被当作骨折进行治疗。这进一步证明,对于无并发症的儿科锁骨骨折,通常不需要进行X光检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e9/6089283/018eefa8d066/bmjpo-2018-000304f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验