Jermendy György, Kiss Zoltán, Rokszin György, Abonyi-Tóth Zsolt, Wittmann István, Kempler Péter
Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Hospital, Maglódi út 89-91, 1106, Budapest, Hungary.
Faculty of Medicine, 2nd Department of Medicine and Nephrological Center, University of Pécs, Pacsirta út 1, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Oct;9(5):2133-2141. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0483-4. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Adequate persistence to antidiabetic treatment is highly important to achieve proper glycemic control. In this study we evaluate the persistence to treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in a nationwide cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Using a central database in Hungary, we analyzed the persistence to the treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (n = 59,900), sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (n = 26,052), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (n = 17,332) at treatment intensification between 2014 and 2016. We also compared the persistence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (n = 9163) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (n = 1257) in initial therapy to that of metformin (n = 79,305) or sulfonylureas (n = 29,057). The rates of persistence to treatment and risk of non-persistence are reported.
The persistence rates of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists at treatment intensification were 69.6%, 67.8%, and 66.3% at year 1 which decreased to 57.3%, 56.8%, and 52.1% by year 2, respectively. The risk of non-persistence was higher by 6.6% (95% CI 3.6-9.6) for sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and by 8.3% (95% CI 5.0-11.5) for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Novel oral antidiabetic drugs in fixed versus free add-on combinations with metformin had higher persistence. The persistence to treatment with novel oral antidiabetic drugs in initial therapy was better (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, 59.6% and 47.6%; sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, 61.9% and 47.0%) than that of initial monotherapy with metformin (47.0% and 39.1%) or sulfonylureas (52.4% and 41.8%) at years 1 and 2, respectively.
Analysis of persistence of treatment with novel glucose-lowering medications revealed differences between drug classes, favoring dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Persistence data of novel antihyperglycemic agents may be useful for guiding the decision at initiation of antidiabetic treatment.
Hungarian Diabetes Association. Plain language summary available for this article.
坚持足够疗程的抗糖尿病治疗对于实现良好的血糖控制至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了全国范围内2型糖尿病患者队列中使用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗的持续性。
利用匈牙利的一个中央数据库,我们分析了2014年至2016年治疗强化时使用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(n = 59,900)、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(n = 26,052)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(n = 17,332)治疗的持续性。我们还比较了初始治疗中使用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(n = 9163)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(n = 1257)与二甲双胍(n = 79,305)或磺脲类药物(n = 29,057)的持续性。报告了治疗的持续率和不持续的风险。
治疗强化时,二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在第1年的持续率分别为69.6%、67.8%和66.3%,到第2年分别降至57.3%、56.8%和52.1%。与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂相比,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂不持续的风险高6.6%(95%CI 3.6 - 9.6),胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂高8.3%(95%CI 5.0 - 11.5)。新型口服抗糖尿病药物与二甲双胍联用的固定剂量与自由添加组合具有更高的持续性。在初始治疗中,新型口服抗糖尿病药物的治疗持续性(二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂,第1年和第2年分别为59.6%和47.6%;钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂,第1年和第2年分别为61.9%和47.0%)优于初始单用二甲双胍(第1年和第2年分别为47.0%和39.1%)或磺脲类药物(第1年和第2年分别为52.4%和41.8%)。
新型降糖药物治疗持续性分析显示不同药物类别之间存在差异,二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂优于钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂。新型降糖药物的持续性数据可能有助于指导抗糖尿病治疗起始时的决策。
匈牙利糖尿病协会。本文有通俗易懂的摘要。