Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;56(6):885-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
The aim of this paper was to provide recommendations for diagnosis and management in the setting of infection following open or endovascular reconstructions of the supra-aortic trunks.
A review of the Medline database was performed from 1997 to 2017 by a combined strategy of MeSh terms.
The literature search identified 49 publications: 36 studies addressing prosthetic material infections and 13 studies addressing stent infections. A total of 140 cases of prosthetic material infections were reported, mostly involving carotid patches. Surgical treatment was mostly based on complete removal of the infected material followed by in situ arterial reconstruction (86 cases, 62.3%). Peri-operative complications included cranial nerve injury in 17 cases (12.5%), stroke in eight (6.7%), bleeding in four (2.9%), re-infection in five (3.6%), and cardiac failure in three cases (2.2%). Stent infections were reported in 12 patients: eight carotid stents, three subclavian stents and one tandem brachiocephalic subclavian stent. Treatment was not described for one case, was conservative in one case, consisted of stent removal with venous reconstruction in six cases, stent removal without reconstruction because of carotid thrombosis in two cases, and carotid embolisation in two cases. Complications included intra-operative death in one case (9.1%), stroke in two (18.2%), reinfection in one (9.1%), bleeding in one (9.1%), and cardiac failure in one case (9.1%).
Appropriate pre-operative imaging is mandatory and treatment modality should be determined by patient condition. Complete removal of the infected material, followed by in situ arterial reconstruction with venous material seems advisable, despite high morbidity. However, alternative strategies may be considered for fragile and high risk patients. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to ensure optimum results.
本文旨在为胸主动脉弓上开放或血管内重建后感染的诊断和治疗提供建议。
通过 MeSh 术语的联合策略,对 1997 年至 2017 年期间的 Medline 数据库进行了回顾。
文献检索共确定了 49 篇文献:36 篇研究涉及人工假体材料感染,13 篇研究涉及支架感染。共报告了 140 例人工假体材料感染,主要涉及颈动脉补片。手术治疗主要基于完全清除感染材料,然后进行原位动脉重建(86 例,62.3%)。围手术期并发症包括 17 例颅神经损伤(12.5%)、8 例中风(6.7%)、4 例出血(2.9%)、5 例再感染(3.6%)和 3 例心力衰竭(2.2%)。报告了 12 例支架感染:8 例颈动脉支架,3 例锁骨下支架和 1 例颈总动脉锁骨下支架。1 例未描述治疗方法,1 例为保守治疗,6 例为支架取出加静脉重建,2 例因颈动脉血栓形成而未重建,2 例为颈动脉栓塞。并发症包括术中死亡 1 例(9.1%)、中风 2 例(18.2%)、再感染 1 例(9.1%)、出血 1 例(9.1%)和心力衰竭 1 例(9.1%)。
术前适当的影像学检查是必要的,应根据患者的病情确定治疗方式。尽管发病率较高,但彻底清除感染材料,然后用静脉材料原位重建动脉似乎是可行的。然而,对于脆弱和高危患者,可能需要考虑替代策略。多学科方法是确保最佳结果的必要条件。