Respiratory Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal and Medicine Department, Universidad de Alcalá (IRYCIS), Ctra. Colmenar Km. 9,100, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Clin Chest Med. 2018 Sep;39(3):569-581. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2018.04.011.
Contemporary studies of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have evaluated the role of thrombolytics in intermediate-risk PE. Significant findings are that thrombolytic therapy may prevent hemodynamic deterioration and all-cause mortality but increases major bleeding. Benefits and harms are finely balanced with no convincing net benefit from thrombolytic therapy among unselected patients. Among patients with intermediate risk PE, additional prognostic factors or subtle hemodynamic changes might alter the risk-benefit assessment in favor of thrombolytic therapy before obvious hemodynamic instability.
当代急性肺栓塞 (PE) 的研究评估了溶栓治疗在中危 PE 中的作用。主要发现是溶栓治疗可能预防血液动力学恶化和全因死亡率,但增加大出血风险。溶栓治疗在未选择的患者中无明显获益,其获益与危害平衡,利弊精细权衡。在明显血液动力学不稳定之前,中危 PE 患者的其它预后因素或细微血液动力学变化可能改变溶栓治疗的风险获益评估。