Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin D24 NR0A, Ireland.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;62:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
India's new mental health legislation, the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, was commenced on 29 May 2018 and seeks explicitly to comply with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It grants a legally binding right to mental healthcare to over 1.3 billion people, one sixth of the planet's population. Key measures include (a) new definitions of 'mental illness' and 'mental health establishment'; (b) revised consideration of 'capacity' in relation to mental healthcare (c) 'advance directives' to permit persons with mental illness to direct future care; (d) 'nominated representatives', who need not be family members; (e) the right to mental healthcare and broad social rights for the mentally ill; (f) establishment of governmental authorities to oversee services; (g) Mental Health Review Boards to review admissions and other matters; (h) revised procedures for 'independent admission' (voluntary admission), 'supported admission' (admission and treatment without patient consent), and 'admission of minor'; (i) revised rules governing treatment, restraint and research; and (j) de facto decriminalization of suicide. Key challenges relate to resourcing both mental health services and the new structures proposed in the legislation, the appropriateness of apparently increasingly legalized approaches to care (especially the implications of potentially lengthy judicial proceedings), and possible paradoxical effects resulting in barriers to care (e.g. revised licensing requirements for general hospital psychiatry units). There is ongoing controversy about specific measures (e.g. the ban on electro-convulsive therapy without muscle relaxants and anaesthesia), reflecting a need for continued engagement with stakeholders including patients, families, the Indian Psychiatric Society and non-governmental organisations. Despite these challenges, the new legislation offers substantial potential benefits not only to India but, by example, to other countries that seek to align their laws with the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and improve the position of the mentally ill.
印度新的心理健康立法,即 2017 年的《精神保健法案》,于 2018 年 5 月 29 日开始实施,明确旨在遵守《联合国残疾人权利公约》。该法案赋予了 13 亿多人口(占世界人口的六分之一)获得精神保健的法律权利。主要措施包括:(a) 对“精神疾病”和“精神保健机构”进行新的定义;(b) 修订与精神保健相关的“能力”考量;(c)“预先指示”,允许精神病患者指导未来的护理;(d) “指定代表”,不一定是家庭成员;(e) 精神疾病患者的精神保健和广泛的社会权利;(f) 设立监督服务的政府机构;(g) 精神健康审查委员会审查入院和其他事项;(h) 修订“独立入院”(自愿入院)、“支持入院”(不经患者同意入院和治疗)和“未成年人入院”的程序;(i) 修订治疗、约束和研究规则;以及 (j) 自杀事实上非刑罪化。主要挑战涉及为精神保健服务和立法中提出的新结构提供资源,护理方法表面上越来越合法(尤其是可能导致漫长司法程序的影响)的适当性,以及可能导致护理障碍的悖论效应(例如,修订综合医院精神病科单位的许可要求)。对具体措施(例如禁止无肌肉松弛剂和麻醉的电抽搐疗法)存在持续争议,反映出需要继续与利益攸关方(包括患者、家属、印度精神病学会和非政府组织)接触。尽管存在这些挑战,但新立法不仅为印度,而且为其他寻求使本国法律与《联合国残疾人权利公约》保持一致并改善精神疾病患者状况的国家带来了巨大的潜在利益。