Deshpande Smita N, Nimgaonkar Vishwajit L, Bhatia Triptish, Mishra Nagendra Narayan, Nagpal Rajesh, Parker Lisa S
Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Department of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 May 25;12(2):87-102. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00116-4. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Considerations of justice and concern for well-being support conducting mental health research and addressing ethical concerns specific to mental health research are critical. We discuss these concerns, provide recommendations to enable the ethical conduct of mental health research, and argue that participants' interests should be given primary weight in resolving apparent dilemmas. We also comment on provisions of two legislative actions in India relevant to mental health research: Rights of Persons with Disability Act 2016 and the Mental Health Care Act 2017. Both conform to the 2006 United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities of which India is a signatory. Both provide protections and enumerate rights relevant to people with mental health conditions but with differing focus. The commonalities and differences between the three are discussed in the background of international literature on research in mental health conditions. Studies involving deception and future directions for ethical requirements regarding genetic research are discussed.
对正义的考量以及对福祉的关注支持开展心理健康研究,而处理心理健康研究特有的伦理问题至关重要。我们讨论这些问题,提供建议以确保心理健康研究的伦理行为,并主张在解决明显的困境时应将参与者的利益放在首位。我们还评论了印度两项与心理健康研究相关的立法行动条款:2016年《残疾人权利法》和2017年《精神保健法》。这两项法案均符合印度签署的2006年《联合国残疾人权利公约》。两者都提供保护并列举了与精神健康状况者相关的权利,但重点有所不同。在关于精神健康状况研究的国际文献背景下,讨论了三者之间的异同。还讨论了涉及欺骗的研究以及基因研究伦理要求的未来方向。