Klinik für Innere Medizin III (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Kardiopathologie, Institut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;274:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.142. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
Inflammatory heart disease is known to be associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and impaired ventricular function at presentation or during follow-up. We aimed to investigate the need for implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) due to ventricular dysfunction and occurrence of VA during long-term follow-up in patients admitted with suspected myocarditis.
Between 2000 and 2016, 191 patients (age 43 ± 13 years, 71% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 33 ± 15%) with clinically suspected myocarditis, who underwent endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), were prospectively enrolled and followed up in 6-months-intervals (median follow-up was 83 (49-156) months). The primary endpoint was deterioration of cardiac function (LVEF ≤ 35%) or occurrence of VA leading to ICD implantation.
According to EMB results, patients were stratified in three diagnostic groups: acute myocarditis (5%), chronic myocarditis (50%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (45%). An ICD implantation was performed in 58 patients (30%, n = 38 for primary prevention). Besides LVEF at baseline, chronic myocardial inflammation was the only independent predictor of ICD implantation for primary prevention (hazard ratio 2.48 (95% confidence interval 1.02-5.5); p = 0.045). VA requiring ICD therapy occurred in 29 of 58 patients (50%) after a median of 14 (2-37) months without a significant difference between presence and absence of myocardial inflammation.
Nearly one third of patients with suspected myocarditis require an ICD due to impaired LVEF or occurrence of VA. Half of these patients experienced VA with adequate ICD therapy.
已知炎症性心脏病与室性心律失常(VA)和心室功能障碍相关,无论是在发病时还是在随访期间。我们旨在研究因心室功能障碍和 VA 发生而在疑似心肌炎患者的长期随访中需要植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的情况。
2000 年至 2016 年间,191 名(年龄 43±13 岁,71%为男性,平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)为 33±15%)患有临床疑似心肌炎并接受心内膜心肌活检(EMB)的患者被前瞻性纳入并进行 6 个月间隔的随访(中位随访时间为 83(49-156)个月)。主要终点是心脏功能恶化(LVEF≤35%)或发生导致 ICD 植入的 VA。
根据 EMB 结果,患者被分为三个诊断组:急性心肌炎(5%)、慢性心肌炎(50%)和扩张型心肌病(DCM)(45%)。58 名患者(30%,n=38 例为一级预防)接受了 ICD 植入。除了基线 LVEF 外,慢性心肌炎症是 ICD 植入一级预防的唯一独立预测因素(风险比 2.48(95%置信区间 1.02-5.5);p=0.045)。58 名患者中有 29 名(50%)在中位数为 14(2-37)个月后发生需要 ICD 治疗的 VA,而存在或不存在心肌炎症之间没有显著差异。
近三分之一的疑似心肌炎患者需要因 LVEF 降低或 VA 发生而植入 ICD。这些患者中有一半经历了 VA,ICD 治疗效果良好。