Rüegger Christoph M, Davis Peter G, Cheong Jeanie L
Newborn Research, Department of Neonatology, University Hospital and University of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 8091.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD012753. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012753.pub2.
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a serious birth complication affecting term and late preterm newborns. Although therapeutic hypothermia (cooling) has been shown to be an effective therapy for neonatal HIE, many cooled infants have poor long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. In animal models of neonatal encephalopathy, inhaled xenon combined with cooling has been shown to offer better neuroprotection than cooling alone.
To determine the effects of xenon as an adjuvant to therapeutic hypothermia on mortality and neurodevelopmental morbidity, and to ascertain clinically important side effects of xenon plus therapeutic hypothermia in newborn infants with HIE. To assess early predictors of adverse outcomes and potential side effects of xenon.
We used the standard strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Library (2017, Issue 8), MEDLINE (from 1966), Embase (from 1966), and PubMed (from 1966) for randomised controlled and quasi-randomised trials. We also searched conference proceedings and the reference lists of cited articles. We conducted our most recent search in August 2017.
We included all trials allocating term or late preterm encephalopathic newborns to cooling plus xenon or cooling alone, irrespective of timing (starting age and duration) and concentrations used for xenon administration.
Two review authors independently assessed results of searches against predetermined criteria for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. We performed meta-analyses using risk ratios (RRs), risk differences (RDs), and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data.
A single randomised controlled trial enrolling 92 participants was eligible for this review. Researchers have not reported long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, including the primary outcome of this review - death or long-term major neurodevelopmental disability in infancy (18 months to three years of age). Cooling plus xenon was not associated with reduced mortality at latest follow-up, based upon low quality evidence. Investigators noted no substantial differences between groups for other secondary outcomes of this review, such as biomarkers of brain damage assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and occurrence of seizures during primary hospitalisation. Available data do not show an increased adverse event rate in the cooling plus xenon group compared with the cooling alone group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence from one small randomised controlled pilot trial is inadequate to show whether cooling plus xenon is safe or effective in near-term and term newborns with HIE. Further trials reporting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes are needed.
缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)是一种影响足月儿和晚期早产儿的严重出生并发症。尽管治疗性低温(降温)已被证明是治疗新生儿HIE的有效方法,但许多接受降温治疗的婴儿长期神经发育结局不佳。在新生儿脑病的动物模型中,吸入氙气联合降温已被证明比单纯降温具有更好的神经保护作用。
确定氙气作为治疗性低温辅助手段对死亡率和神经发育疾病的影响,并确定氙气加治疗性低温在患有HIE的新生儿中的重要临床副作用。评估不良结局的早期预测因素以及氙气的潜在副作用。
我们采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准策略,检索Cochrane图书馆(2017年第8期)、MEDLINE(从1966年起)、Embase(从1966年起)和PubMed(从1966年起),以查找随机对照试验和半随机试验。我们还检索了会议论文集和被引用文章的参考文献列表。我们于2017年8月进行了最新检索。
我们纳入了所有将足月儿或晚期早产儿脑病新生儿分配至降温加氙气组或单纯降温组的试验,无论氙气给药的时机(开始年龄和持续时间)和浓度如何。
两位综述作者独立根据预定的纳入标准评估检索结果,评估偏倚风险并提取数据。我们使用风险比(RRs)、风险差异(RDs)以及为获得额外有益结局所需治疗的人数(NNTB)进行荟萃分析,二分类结局采用95%置信区间(CIs),连续数据采用均值差异(MDs)。
一项纳入92名参与者的随机对照试验符合本综述的要求。研究人员未报告长期神经发育结局,包括本综述的主要结局——婴儿期(18个月至3岁)死亡或长期严重神经发育残疾。基于低质量证据,降温加氙气在最新随访时与死亡率降低无关。研究人员指出,在本综述的其他次要结局方面,两组之间没有实质性差异,例如通过磁共振成像评估的脑损伤生物标志物以及初次住院期间癫痫发作的发生率。现有数据未显示降温加氙气组与单纯降温组相比不良事件发生率增加。
来自一项小型随机对照试点试验的当前证据不足以表明降温加氙气在患有HIE的近期和足月儿中是否安全或有效。需要进一步的试验报告长期神经发育结局。