1 Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.
2 Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jan;28(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6857. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
Since the early 1990s, the HIV research agenda has prioritized to some degree the inclusion of pregnant women. However, concerns remain regarding the extent to which pregnant women's own health needs are addressed, representation in trials of HIV preventives or treatments for comorbidities, and equitable study of newer medications during pregnancy.
We employed a keyword search of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify interventional HIV-related trials conducted with pregnant women between January 2001 and December 2015. Retained trials were coded according to several key variables (e.g., study endpoints, trial phase, study compound) and analyzed using information provided in the database.
In total, 63 trials studying use of a pharmacological compound during pregnancy were conducted across 35 countries and sponsored by 74 unique organizations, including pharmaceutical companies. Of trials analyzed, 86% (n = 54) listed maternal outcomes as a primary endpoint. More than 35% (n = 23) of trials assessed pharmacokinetic parameters of a study compound during pregnancy. Of 45 trials specifically studying HIV-related medication(s), just 4% (n = 2) focused on HIV preventives. One trial studied tuberculosis in HIV-infected pregnant women; 11 studied malaria. On average, medications were studied during pregnancy 4.4 years after licensure.
Our findings demonstrate that trials with pregnant women are conducted across a range of countries and sponsors, and much progress has been made to better address pregnant women's own health needs in HIV research. However, our findings confirm other concerns, for example, lack of HIV preventives studied and the lag between medication licensure and study during pregnancy.
自 20 世纪 90 年代初以来,艾滋病毒研究议程在某种程度上优先考虑纳入孕妇。然而,人们仍然关注孕妇自身健康需求的满足程度、在艾滋病毒预防药物或合并症治疗试验中的代表性,以及在怀孕期间对新药的公平研究。
我们利用国际临床试验注册平台的关键字搜索,确定了 2001 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间针对孕妇开展的艾滋病毒相关干预性试验。保留的试验根据几个关键变量(如研究终点、试验阶段、研究化合物)进行编码,并利用数据库中提供的信息进行分析。
共有 63 项研究在 35 个国家开展,由 74 个不同的组织(包括制药公司)赞助,研究在怀孕期间使用一种药物化合物。在所分析的试验中,86%(n=54)将母婴结局列为主要终点。超过 35%(n=23)的试验评估了研究化合物在怀孕期间的药代动力学参数。在专门研究艾滋病毒相关药物的 45 项试验中,只有 4%(n=2)的试验关注艾滋病毒预防药物。有 1 项试验研究了艾滋病毒感染孕妇的结核病,11 项研究了疟疾。平均而言,药物在获得许可后 4.4 年才开始在怀孕期间进行研究。
我们的研究结果表明,在一系列国家和赞助商中开展了针对孕妇的试验,在更好地满足艾滋病毒研究中孕妇自身健康需求方面取得了很大进展。然而,我们的研究结果证实了其他一些担忧,例如缺乏研究的艾滋病毒预防药物以及药物许可和怀孕期间研究之间的滞后。