Harrington Anne
Osiris. 2016;31:94-115.
Most scholarship on the medicalization of emotions has focused on projects that locate emotions, one way or another, within individual brains and minds. The story of mother love and mental illness, in contrast, is a medicalization story that frames the problem of pathological emotions as a relational issue. Bad mother love was seen as both a pathology (for the mother) and a pathogen (for her vulnerable child).Moreover, different forms of pathological mother love—smothering love, ambivalent love, love that masked an actual desire to dominate and control—were supposed to have different effects on children, ranging from lack of fitness for military service to homosexuality to juvenile delinquency to outright psychosis, especially schizophrenia. Understanding why mother love came to be associated with mental illness—and, equally, what led to this viewpoint’s rapid decline into disrepute—requires us to go beyond simply invoking the trope of “mother blaming” and leaving things at that. This essay is a first effort at a richer narrative, one that blends perspectives from the history of emotions and the history of science and medicine.
大多数关于情感医学化的学术研究都聚焦于这样一些项目,这些项目以某种方式将情感定位在个体的大脑和心智之中。相比之下,母爱与精神疾病的故事是一个将病理性情感问题界定为关系问题的医学化故事。糟糕的母爱既被视为一种病理学症状(针对母亲而言),又被看作一种致病因素(针对她脆弱的孩子而言)。此外,不同形式的病理性母爱——溺爱、矛盾的爱、掩盖了实际支配和控制欲望的爱——被认为会对孩子产生不同的影响,从不适宜服兵役到同性恋、从青少年犯罪到彻底的精神病,尤其是精神分裂症。要理解为什么母爱会与精神疾病联系在一起,同样,是什么导致这种观点迅速声名狼藉,我们需要超越简单地援引“责备母亲”这一陈词滥调,而仅止于此。本文是迈向更丰富叙事的首次尝试,这种叙事融合了情感史以及科学与医学史的观点。