Red River College, C608-2055 Notre Dame Ave., Winnipeg, MB R3H 0J9, Canada; University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Nov;70:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
This study explores patterns of writing self-efficacy fluctuation across three academic years in a baccalaureate nursing program. The goal was to assess if writing self-efficacy predicted program grades.
Longitudinal exploratory design.
Three-year accelerated nursing program in a college setting in Canada.
Follow-up cohort included 49 students; 32 (65.3%) synchronous in program progression and 17 (34.7%) had become asynchronous between first and third year.
Data was collected five times between August 2013 and May 2016 at program admission, the start of their discipline-specific first-year writing course, the end of the writing course, start of third-year, and the end of third-year. Variables assessed included writing self-efficacy (two measures), writing anxiety, entrance degrees of reading power (DRP) scores, final college cumulative grade point average (GPA), and grades earned on first, second, and third-year papers.
Writing self-efficacy statistically significantly improved from the start of the nursing program to the finish (p < .001). Writing self-efficacy fluctuated decreasing from post first-year writing course to the start of the third-year, returning to or exceeding end of writing course levels by the end of the third year. Students who progressed normally through the program (synchronous) were academically stronger (paper grades, DRP, GPA scores) and had higher writing self-efficacy scores than asynchronous students. Using hierarchical regression, DRP scores and synchronous/asynchronous status in the program made a larger contribution to the prediction of final program GPA and paper grades, while the inclusion of writing self-efficacy in the models made a minor contribution to overall variance.
Writing self-efficacy will fluctuate based on context and complexity of writing demanded in academic programs. Second and third-year students require continued support with writing beyond an introductory course. Programs should attend to developing reading comprehension in students as part of their across-the-curriculum writing plans.
本研究探索了学士学位护理课程三个学年中写作自我效能感的波动模式。目的是评估写作自我效能感是否能预测课程成绩。
纵向探索性设计。
加拿大一所学院的三年制加速护理课程。
随访队列包括 49 名学生;32 名(65.3%)同步完成课程,17 名(34.7%)在第一学年和第三学年之间异步完成。
数据于 2013 年 8 月至 2016 年 5 月间五次收集,分别在课程入学时、特定于学科的第一年写作课程开始时、写作课程结束时、第三年开始时和第三年结束时。评估的变量包括写作自我效能感(两个测量)、写作焦虑、阅读能力入门程度(DRP)分数、最终大学累计平均绩点(GPA)以及第一年、第二年和第三年论文的成绩。
从护理课程开始到结束,写作自我效能感有统计学意义上的显著提高(p<0.001)。写作自我效能感从第一年写作课程结束到第三年开始时下降,在第三年结束时恢复到或超过写作课程结束时的水平。正常完成课程的学生(同步)在学术上更强(论文成绩、DRP、GPA 分数),写作自我效能感分数也高于异步学生。使用层次回归,DRP 分数和课程中的同步/异步状态对最终课程 GPA 和论文成绩的预测贡献更大,而将写作自我效能感纳入模型对整体方差的贡献较小。
写作自我效能感将根据学术课程中写作的要求的背景和复杂程度而波动。第二和第三年的学生需要在入门课程之外继续得到写作方面的支持。课程应注意培养学生的阅读理解能力,作为其跨课程写作计划的一部分。