Reinier Kyndaron, Aro Aapo L, Uy-Evanado Audrey, Rusinaru Carmen, Chugh Harpriya S, Shiota Takahiro, Jui Jonathan, Chugh Sumeet S
Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Nov;23(6):e12591. doi: 10.1111/anec.12591. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
Early diagnosis and therapy improves outcomes in heart failure with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%), but some patients may remain undiagnosed. We hypothesized that a combination of electrocardiogram (ECG) markers may identify individuals with severely reduced LVEF.
From a community-based study in the Northwest US (the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study), we evaluated the prevalence of conventional ECG markers by LVEF. We then evaluated the association of nine additional ECG markers and LVEF. We validated the correlation of these ECG markers and LVEF in a separate, large health system in Los Angeles, California.
In the discovery population (n = 1,047), patients with LVEF ≤35% were twice as likely as those with LVEF >35% to have ≥1 conventional ECG abnormality. In the subset without conventional ECG abnormalities, ≥4 abnormal ECG markers from the expanded panel were found in 12% vs. 1% of patients with LVEF ≤35% and >35%, respectively. In the validation population (n = 9,742), 44% with LVEF ≤35% and 17% with LVEF >35% had ≥1 conventional ECG abnormality. In patients without conventional ECG abnormalities (n = 7,601), 40% with LVEF ≤35% and 5% with LVEF >35% had ≥4 abnormal ECG markers from the expanded panel. Each additional abnormal ECG marker from the expanded panel (range 0 to ≥4) more than doubled the odds of LVEF ≤35%.
An expanded panel of easily obtained ECG markers correlated strongly with severely reduced LVEF in two separate populations. This electrical surrogate score could facilitate diagnosis of severely reduced LVEF, and warrants prospective evaluation.
早期诊断和治疗可改善左心室射血分数严重降低(LVEF≤35%)的心力衰竭患者的预后,但仍有一些患者可能未被诊断出来。我们推测,心电图(ECG)标志物的组合可能有助于识别LVEF严重降低的个体。
在美国西北部的一项基于社区的研究(俄勒冈州突发意外死亡研究)中,我们根据LVEF评估了传统ECG标志物的患病率。然后,我们评估了另外九种ECG标志物与LVEF的关联。我们在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的另一个大型医疗系统中验证了这些ECG标志物与LVEF的相关性。
在发现队列(n = 1047)中,LVEF≤35%的患者出现≥1种传统ECG异常的可能性是LVEF>35%患者的两倍。在没有传统ECG异常的亚组中,LVEF≤35%和>35%的患者中,分别有12%和1%的患者出现了扩展组中≥4种异常ECG标志物。在验证队列(n = 9742)中,LVEF≤35%的患者中有44%出现≥1种传统ECG异常,LVEF>35%的患者中有17%出现该异常。在没有传统ECG异常的患者(n = 7601)中,LVEF≤35%的患者中有40%出现扩展组中≥4种异常ECG标志物,LVEF>35%的患者中有5%出现该异常。扩展组中每增加一种异常ECG标志物(范围为0至≥4),LVEF≤35%的几率就会增加一倍多。
在两个独立队列中,一组易于获取的扩展ECG标志物与严重降低的LVEF密切相关。这种电替代评分有助于诊断严重降低的LVEF,值得进行前瞻性评估。