Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
HealthMPowers, USA.
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Feb;22(2):191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
To assess the impact of Power Up for 30, a flexible, Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program-based state-wide elementary school initiative, on school physical activity opportunities (physical education, recess, in-class physical activity, before-school physical activity, and after-school physical activity) one year after Power Up for 30 training.
Quasi-experimental.
In 2013, all 1333 public Georgia elementary schools were invited to complete the School Physical Activity Survey which assessed school physical activity opportunities. Upon survey completion, schools were invited to attend training. Of the 719 (54%) schools meeting survey response criteria, 300 schools attended training by 9/2014 and 419 schools did not. Between 3/2015-5/2015, 79 trained and 80 untrained schools were randomly selected to receive a follow-up survey assessing the frequency and duration of physical activity opportunities. Analyses, adjusted for baseline physical activity opportunities and school characteristics, compared weekly minutes of physical activity opportunities at follow-up between trained and untrained schools.
In adjusted analyses at follow-up, trained schools provided 36 more minutes of weekly physical activity opportunities than untrained schools (99% confidence interval: 16-56), particularly during recess (mean difference: 8min per week; 99% confidence interval: 0-17), during in-class breaks (mean difference: 11min per week, 99% confidence interval: 3-20), and before school (mean difference: 8min per week, 99% confidence interval: 4-12).
Flexible, multi-component interventions like Power Up for 30 increase physical activity opportunities. If future studies identify that school physical activity opportunities positively impact student physical activity, this model may be a feasible strategy for broad-scale implementation.
评估 Power Up for 30 的影响,这是一项灵活的、基于全州小学的全面学校体育活动计划,旨在评估 Power Up for 30 培训一年后对学校体育活动机会(体育课、课间休息、课堂内体育活动、课前体育活动和课后体育活动)的影响。
准实验。
2013 年,所有 1333 所乔治亚州公立小学都被邀请完成学校体育活动调查,该调查评估了学校体育活动机会。完成调查后,学校被邀请参加培训。在符合调查回复标准的 719 所(54%)学校中,有 300 所学校于 2014 年 9 月参加了培训,而 419 所学校没有。在 2015 年 3 月至 5 月期间,随机选择了 79 所接受过培训的学校和 80 所未接受过培训的学校进行后续调查,以评估体育活动机会的频率和持续时间。调整了基线体育活动机会和学校特征的分析,比较了培训和未培训学校在随访时每周的体育活动时间。
在随访时的调整分析中,培训学校每周提供的体育活动机会比未培训学校多 36 分钟(99%置信区间:16-56),特别是在课间休息期间(平均差异:8 分钟/周;99%置信区间:0-17),在课堂休息期间(平均差异:11 分钟/周,99%置信区间:3-20)和课前(平均差异:8 分钟/周,99%置信区间:4-12)。
像 Power Up for 30 这样灵活的、多组分的干预措施可以增加体育活动机会。如果未来的研究确定学校体育活动机会对学生的体育活动有积极影响,那么这种模式可能是一种可行的广泛实施策略。