Department of Psychology, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018 Dec;43(4):301-307. doi: 10.1007/s10484-018-9410-8.
Specific learning disorder (SLD) can occur along with the problems of attention performance and be complicated by them. Recent studies have reported the positive effects of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) and neurofeedback (NFB) on sustained attention (SA) in SLD. Nevertheless, it has not yet been determinedwhat kind of treatment may be the most appropriate option for this disorder in terms of the different functions of cognitive status, especially SA. This preliminary study aimed to compare CR and NFB effects on SA among elementary school students with SLD using a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). Fifty- three eligible students with a DSM-5 SLD diagnosis, aged 7-10, were randomly allocated in NFB (n = 18), CR (n = 18), and control groups (n = 17). All the participants were evaluated for SA by performing the continuous performance test (CPT) on the studied groups at the time of their inclusion in the study and 7 weeks after it. The intervention groups took part in 20 sessions of CR and 20 sessions of NFB. Conversely, the untreated group were evaluated without any intervention.15 boys and 30 girls in 3 groups completed the study (n = 15 per group). The mean and standard deviation of participants' age were (8.66 ± 1.48) years, (8.40 ± 1.73) years and (8.53 ± 1.63) years in CR, NFB and untreated groups, respectively. The results showed significant differences between the groups based on the variables of the CPT test (p < 0.05). Also, the significant effects of the variables represented the higher scores of the CR compared to the NFB group (p < 0.001). This study provides einitial evidence that CR is more effective than NFB on SA improvement among students with SLD.
特定学习障碍 (SLD) 可能与注意力表现问题同时发生,并受到其影响。最近的研究报告了认知康复 (CR) 和神经反馈 (NFB) 对 SLD 患者持续性注意力 (SA) 的积极影响。然而,对于这种障碍,针对认知状态的不同功能,特别是针对 SA,哪种治疗方法可能是最合适的选择,目前尚未确定。本初步研究旨在通过随机对照临床试验 (RCT) 比较 CR 和 NFB 对 SLD 小学生 SA 的影响。共有 53 名符合 DSM-5 SLD 诊断标准、年龄在 7-10 岁的合格学生被随机分配到 NFB 组(n = 18)、CR 组(n = 18)和对照组(n = 17)。所有参与者在入组时和入组后 7 周通过连续性能测试 (CPT) 对 SA 进行评估。干预组分别参加 20 次 CR 和 20 次 NFB。相反,未接受治疗的组在没有任何干预的情况下进行评估。3 组中有 15 名男孩和 30 名女孩完成了研究(每组 15 名)。CR、NFB 和未治疗组参与者的年龄均值和标准差分别为(8.66 ± 1.48)岁、(8.40 ± 1.73)岁和(8.53 ± 1.63)岁。结果表明,CPT 测试的组间变量存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。此外,变量的显著影响表明 CR 组的得分高于 NFB 组(p < 0.001)。这项研究提供了初步证据,表明 CR 在改善 SLD 学生的 SA 方面比 NFB 更有效。