• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Changing Landscape of Continuing Care in Alberta: Staff and Resident Characteristics in Supportive Living and Long-Term Care.阿尔伯塔省持续护理的变化格局:支持性生活和长期护理中的工作人员及居民特征
Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):44-56. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25549.
2
Are healthcare aides underused in long-term care? A cross-sectional study on continuing care facilities in Canada.长期护理中医疗护理员是否未得到充分利用?一项关于加拿大持续护理机构的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e015521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015521.
3
The Influence of Supportive Supervisory Practices and Health Care Aides' Self-Determination on the Provision of Person-Centered Care in Long-Term Care Facilities.支持性监督实践和保健助理的自我决定对长期护理机构提供以患者为中心的护理的影响。
J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Nov;38(11):1564-1582. doi: 10.1177/0733464817750275. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
4
Prevalence of, and Resident and Facility Characteristics Associated With Antipsychotic Use in Assisted Living vs. Long-Term Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from Alberta, Canada.辅助生活设施与长期护理机构中抗精神病药物使用的患病率及相关的居民和机构特征:来自加拿大艾伯塔省的横断面分析
Drugs Aging. 2017 Jan;34(1):39-53. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0411-0.
5
The Association of Service Use and Other Client Factors with the Time to Transition from Home Care to Facility-Based Care.服务使用及其他客户因素与从居家护理过渡到机构护理的时间之间的关联
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jan;23(1):133-140.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.027. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.
7
Elevated Hospitalization Risk of Assisted Living Residents With Dementia in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省患有痴呆症的辅助生活居民住院风险升高。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jul 1;16(7):568-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.079. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
8
Advance care planning discussions among residents of long term care and designated assisted living: experience from Calgary, Alberta.长期护理机构和指定辅助生活设施居民之间的预立医疗计划讨论:来自艾伯塔省卡尔加里的经验
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;5(1):48-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000444. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
A comparison of cognitive and functional care differences in four long-term care settings.四种长期护理环境下认知与功能护理差异的比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Feb;7(2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.10.005. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
10
High rates of hospital admission among older residents in assisted living facilities: opportunities for intervention and impact on acute care.辅助生活设施中老年居民的高住院率:干预机会及对急性护理的影响
Open Med. 2014 Mar 4;8(1):e33-45. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
The (un)caring experienced by racialized and/or ethnoculturally diverse residents in supportive living: a qualitative study.在支持性居住中,被种族化和/或民族文化多样化的居民所经历的(不)关怀:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04636-0.
2
Machine learning risk estimation and prediction of death in continuing care facilities using administrative data.利用行政数据进行机器学习,预测持续护理设施中的死亡风险。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 18;13(1):17708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43943-9.
3
Safer Care for Older Persons in (residential) Environments (SCOPE): a pragmatic controlled trial of a care aide-led quality improvement intervention.(居住)环境中老年人更安全护理(SCOPE):护理助手主导的质量改进干预的实用对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2023 Mar 29;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01259-8.
4
Well-being of professional older adults' caregivers in Alberta's assisted living and long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional study.艾伯塔省辅助生活和长期护理设施中专业老年成年人照顾者的幸福感:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03801-9.
5
SCOPE: safer care for older persons (in residential) environments-a pilot study to enhance care aide-led quality improvement in nursing homes.范围:为老年人(在居住环境中)提供更安全的护理——一项提高养老院护理助理主导的质量改进的试点研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Feb 3;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00975-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Location, Location, Location: Characteristics and Services of Long-Stay Home Care Recipients in Retirement Homes Compared to Others in Private Homes and Long-Term Care Homes.位置,位置,位置:与私人住宅和长期护理院中的其他人相比,养老院中长期护理接受者的特征与服务
Healthc Policy. 2017 Feb;12(3):80-93.
2
Insights from nurse leaders to optimize retaining late career nurses.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2014 Sep;27(3):29-39. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2015.24059.
3
Who is looking after Mom and Dad? Unregulated workers in Canadian long-term care homes.谁在照顾爸爸妈妈?加拿大长期护理院的非正规员工。
Can J Aging. 2015 Mar;34(1):47-59. doi: 10.1017/S0714980814000506. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Licensed nurse staffing and health service availability in residential care and assisted living.注册护士人员配备和住宅护理及辅助生活中的卫生服务提供情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 May;62(5):805-11. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12786. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
Nurse staffing impact on quality of care in nursing homes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.护士人员配置对养老院护理质量的影响:纵向研究的系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jun;15(6):383-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.12.080. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
6
Sustaining Transfers through Affordable Research Translation (START): study protocol to assess knowledge translation interventions in continuing care settings.通过可负担的研究转化实现持续转移(START):评估持续护理环境中知识转化干预措施的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Oct 26;14:355. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-355.
7
A profile of residents in prairie nursing homes.草原养老院居民情况简介。
Can J Aging. 2013 Sep;32(3):223-31. doi: 10.1017/S0714980813000287. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Knowledge translation of research findings.研究成果的知识转化。
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50.
9
Nursing home staffing standards and staffing levels in six countries.六个国家的养老院人员配备标准和人员配备水平。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Mar;44(1):88-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01430.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
10
Beyond the 'iron lungs of gerontology': using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in Canada.超越老年学的“铁肺”:利用证据塑造加拿大养老院的未来。
Can J Aging. 2011 Sep;30(3):371-90. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000304. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

阿尔伯塔省持续护理的变化格局:支持性生活和长期护理中的工作人员及居民特征

The Changing Landscape of Continuing Care in Alberta: Staff and Resident Characteristics in Supportive Living and Long-Term Care.

作者信息

Slaughter Susan E, Jones C Allyson, Eliasziw Misha, Ickert Carla, Estabrooks Carole A, Wagg Adrian S

机构信息

Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

Professor, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):44-56. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25549.

DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2018.25549
PMID:30129434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6147366/
Abstract

With provincial policy changing institutional care provision for older adults who are unable to safely remain at home, supportive living represents a new middle-ground to provide care for older adults. We compared characteristics of supportive living staff and residents to those in long-term care (LTC), using facility and staff surveys, as well as administrative Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) data, to describe differences and similarities between facility types. Data analysis included t-tests, chi-square tests, ridit analyses and odds ratios. Participants from 15 supportive living facilities were compared to participants from eight LTC homes. Supportive living healthcare aides were younger, worked fewer years and were more likely to work full time than LTC healthcare aides. LTC residents were more likely than supportive living residents to have: cognitive impairment, medical instability, and activities of daily living dependence. This knowledge, which situates supportive living in the new care continuum, is useful for policy makers and administrators deciding on interventions and clinical guidelines for care groups.

摘要

随着省级政策改变了对无法安全居家的老年人的机构护理服务,支持性居住成为为老年人提供护理的一种新的中间立场。我们通过设施和员工调查以及行政居民评估工具(RAI)数据,比较了支持性居住机构的工作人员和居民与长期护理(LTC)机构的工作人员和居民的特征,以描述不同机构类型之间的差异和相似之处。数据分析包括t检验、卡方检验、ridit分析和比值比。将来自15个支持性居住设施的参与者与来自8个长期护理机构的参与者进行了比较。支持性居住机构的医疗护理员比长期护理机构的医疗护理员更年轻,工作年限更少,并且更有可能全职工作。长期护理机构的居民比支持性居住机构的居民更有可能出现:认知障碍、病情不稳定和日常生活依赖。这些将支持性居住置于新的护理连续体中的知识,对于政策制定者和管理人员决定护理群体的干预措施和临床指南很有用。