From the Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (Dr Gardner); and Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (Dr Allen).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Jan;143(1):75-80. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0313-SA. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
Recent privacy breaches by a major social media company have again raised questions from some pathologists regarding the legality and ethics of sharing pathology images on social media. The authors examined ethical principles as well as historic and legal precedents relevant to pathology medical photography. Taking and sharing photographs of pathology specimens is embedded into the culture of the specialty of pathology and has been for more than a century. In general, the pathologist who takes the photograph of a gross or microscopic specimen owns the copyright to that photograph. Patient consent is not legally or ethically required to take or use deidentified photographs of pathology specimens. Current US privacy laws (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] of 1996) permit public sharing of deidentified pathology photographs without specific patient consent, even on social media. There is no case law of action taken against pathologists for sharing deidentified pathology images on social media or elsewhere. If there is any legal risk for pathologists or risk of patient harm in sharing pathology photographs, it is very small. The benefits of professional social media use for pathologists, patients, and society are numerous and well documented in the literature.
最近,一家大型社交媒体公司的隐私泄露事件再次引发了一些病理学家对在社交媒体上分享病理图像的合法性和道德性的质疑。作者研究了与病理医学摄影相关的伦理原则以及历史和法律先例。拍摄和分享病理标本的照片已经融入了病理学专业的文化,并且已经有一个多世纪的历史了。通常情况下,拍摄大体或显微镜标本照片的病理学家拥有该照片的版权。拍摄和使用无身份识别的病理标本照片不需要法律或道德上的患者同意。当前的美国隐私法(1996 年的《健康保险携带和责任法案》)允许在没有特定患者同意的情况下公开分享无身份识别的病理图像,甚至可以在社交媒体上分享。没有针对病理学家在社交媒体或其他地方分享无身份识别的病理图像而采取的法律行动案例。如果在分享病理图像方面存在任何法律风险或对患者造成伤害的风险,那么这种风险非常小。病理学家、患者和社会从专业社交媒体的使用中受益良多,这在文献中有大量记载。