• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In Defense of Best Interests: When Parents and Clinicians Disagree.

作者信息

Coulson-Smith Peta, Fenwick Angela, Lucassen Anneke

机构信息

a University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):67-69. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485766.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2018.1485766
PMID:30133405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6113898/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
In Defense of Best Interests: When Parents and Clinicians Disagree.捍卫最大利益：当父母与临床医生意见相左时。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):67-69. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485766.
2
Ethical Complexity and Precaution When Parents and Doctors Disagree About Treatment.
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):49-55. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485774.
3
Can Clinicians Be Objective? Inherent Challenges in Using Decision-Making Tools in Cases of Entrenched Disagreements.临床医生能做到客观吗？在存在根深蒂固分歧的案例中使用决策工具所面临的内在挑战。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):80-82. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485761.
4
When staff and parents disagree: decision making for a baby with trisomy 13.当医护人员与家长意见不一时：13三体综合征患儿的决策制定
Mt Sinai J Med. 2006 May;73(3):590-1.
5
Reconsidering Refusal: Are Some Cases Refractory Even to the Best Tools?
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):61-63. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485771.
6
Reasons Don't Matter.理由无关紧要。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):59-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485776.
7
When doctors and parents disagree: a recent example of morally appropriate collaboration between parents, doctors and the court.当医生与家长意见相左时：家长、医生与法庭之间道德上恰当合作的一个近期案例。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Aug;50(8):586-7. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12681. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
8
When doctors disagree: a qualitative study of doctors' and parents' views on the risks of childhood food allergy.当医生意见不一时：关于医生和家长对儿童食物过敏风险看法的定性研究
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):208-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00506.x.
9
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.你只需要伤害？儿童最大利益与关于父母决策的争议。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):111-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102893. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
10
The Value of Open Deliberation in Clinical Ethics, and the Role of Parents' Reasons in the Zone of Parental Discretion.临床伦理中公开审议的价值以及父母理由在父母自由裁量权范围内的作用。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):47-49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485773.

引用本文的文献

1
As low as reasonably practicable (ALARP): a moral model for clinical risk management in the setting of technology dependence.尽可能低地合理可行（ALARP）：技术依赖背景下临床风险管理的道德模型。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 20;50(10):712-715. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109111.
2
Should parents be asked to consent for life-saving paediatric interventions?是否应该要求父母对挽救儿童生命的干预措施表示同意？
J Intensive Care Soc. 2021 Nov;22(4):335-341. doi: 10.1177/1751143720969267. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity.当父母拒绝时：在不确定和复杂的情况下解决父母和临床医生之间根深蒂固的分歧。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):20-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485758.
2
When paediatricians and families can't agree.当儿科医生和家庭意见不一致时。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 May;103(5):413-414. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314414. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
The Road to Clinical Fantasy: A UK Perspective.
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Jan;18(1):26-27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1401166.
4
Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice.儿童生命受限和危及生命情况下限制治疗的决策：实践框架
Arch Dis Child. 2015 May;100 Suppl 2:s3-23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306666.