Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN) and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Addiction. 2019 Jun;114(6):1095-1109. doi: 10.1111/add.14424. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
The US National Institutes of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) seek to stimulate research into biologically validated neuropsychological dimensions across mental illness symptoms and diagnoses. The RDoC framework comprises 39 functional constructs designed to be revised and refined, with the overall goal of improving diagnostic validity and treatments. This study aimed to reach a consensus among experts in the addiction field on the 'primary' RDoC constructs most relevant to substance and behavioural addictions.
Forty-four addiction experts were recruited from Australia, Asia, Europe and the Americas. The Delphi technique was used to determine a consensus as to the degree of importance of each construct in understanding the essential dimensions underpinning addictive behaviours. Expert opinions were canvassed online over three rounds (97% completion rate), with each consecutive round offering feedback for experts to review their opinions.
Seven constructs were endorsed by ≥ 80% of experts as 'primary' to the understanding of addictive behaviour: five from the Positive Valence System (reward valuation, expectancy, action selection, reward learning, habit); one from the Cognitive Control System (response selection/inhibition); and one expert-initiated construct (compulsivity). These constructs were rated to be related differentially to stages of the addiction cycle, with some linked more closely to addiction onset and others more to chronicity. Experts agreed that these neuropsychological dimensions apply across a range of addictions.
The study offers a novel and neuropsychologically informed theoretical framework, as well as a cogent step forward to test transdiagnostic concepts in addiction research, with direct implications for assessment, diagnosis, staging of disorder, and treatment.
美国国立精神卫生研究所的研究领域标准(RDoC)试图刺激对精神疾病症状和诊断中具有生物学验证的神经心理学维度的研究。RDoC 框架由 39 个功能结构组成,旨在进行修订和完善,总体目标是提高诊断的有效性和治疗效果。本研究旨在让成瘾领域的专家就与物质和行为成瘾最相关的“主要”RDoC 结构达成共识。
从澳大利亚、亚洲、欧洲和美洲招募了 44 名成瘾专家。采用德尔菲技术来确定每个结构对理解成瘾行为的基本维度的重要程度的共识程度。专家意见在线上进行了三轮调查(完成率为 97%),每一轮都为专家提供反馈,让他们回顾自己的意见。
有 7 个结构得到了≥80%的专家认可,认为它们对理解成瘾行为是“主要的”:来自积极情绪系统的 5 个结构(奖励评估、期望、行为选择、奖励学习、习惯);来自认知控制系统的 1 个结构(反应选择/抑制);以及一个由专家发起的结构(强迫性)。这些结构被认为与成瘾周期的不同阶段有关,其中一些与成瘾的发生更密切相关,而另一些则与慢性阶段更密切相关。专家们一致认为,这些神经心理学维度适用于各种成瘾。
该研究提供了一个新颖的、神经心理学的理论框架,以及在成瘾研究中测试跨诊断概念的有力步骤,对评估、诊断、疾病分期和治疗都有直接的影响。