Verdejo-Garcia Antonio
School of Psychological Sciences & Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Australia.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Sep;68:270-281. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 May 26.
This article reviews the emerging research on cognitive training for substance use disorders, and discusses the neuroscientific mechanisms that underlie cognitive training effects in addiction. Four cognitive training interventions are reviewed: cognitive bias modification (CBM), response inhibition, working memory (including specific and multi-component approaches), and goal-directed interventions. Based on the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in these trainings they can be clustered in two classes: (1) CBM and response inhibition, which have shown to operate via reorientation of stimulus-action approach biases and rewiring of the medial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala; (2) Working memory and goal-oriented interventions, which have been associated with improvements in stimulus-outcome representations e.g. increased future-based delay-discounting and decision-making, and rewiring of the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices. The cognitive trainings are generally efficacious in improving the trained cognitive processes. The transfer to clinical outcomes is notable and theoretically coherent, although evidence is still preliminary. Replication studies and randomised controlled trials that incorporate neuroscience-based mechanistic accounts are needed to gauge the significance of this line of research.
本文综述了关于物质使用障碍认知训练的最新研究,并讨论了成瘾中认知训练效果背后的神经科学机制。回顾了四种认知训练干预措施:认知偏差修正(CBM)、反应抑制、工作记忆(包括特定和多成分方法)以及目标导向干预。基于对这些训练所涉及机制的了解,它们可分为两类:(1)CBM和反应抑制,已证明其通过刺激 - 行动方式偏差的重新定向以及内侧前额叶皮质和杏仁核的重新布线来起作用;(2)工作记忆和目标导向干预,这与刺激 - 结果表征的改善相关,例如增加基于未来的延迟折扣和决策制定,以及背外侧和腹外侧前额叶皮质的重新布线。认知训练通常在改善所训练的认知过程方面是有效的。尽管证据仍然初步,但向临床结果的转化是显著且在理论上连贯的。需要进行复制研究和纳入基于神经科学的机制解释的随机对照试验,以评估这一研究方向的重要性。