• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嵌甲的治疗:NAOH 化学甲床切除术与楔形切除术。

The treatment of ingrown nail: Chemical matricectomy with NAOH versus wedge resection.

机构信息

Dermatology Clinic, Tunceli State Hospital, Tunceli, Turkey.

Dermatology Clinic, Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2018 Sep;31(5):e12677. doi: 10.1111/dth.12677. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1111/dth.12677
PMID:30134040
Abstract

Ingrown nail is a common problem seen in the dermatology clinics. The aim of this study is to compare the wedge resection method and chemical matricectomy with NaOH in terms of operation time, postoperative pain severity, postoperative drainage, recurrence rates, recovery time, and the effects of these two methods on Dermatology Quality of Life Index. This study included 60 patients. About 42 nail edges of 30 patients were treated with NaOH for chemical matricectomy and wedge resection was performed for 33 nail edges of 30 patients. Operation time for chemical matricectomy and wedge resection was an average of 7.66 ± 3.65 and 19.25 ± 5.54 min (p < .001). Recovery time was an average of 17.27 ± 14.22 days for chemical matricectomy and an average of 28.85 ± 17.03 days for wedge resection (p = .004). Recurrence was detected in 5.4% of the nail edges treated with chemical matricectomy and 3.6% of the nail edges treated with wedge resection (p = 1.000). Absence of differences for the recurrence rates between wedge resection method and chemical matricectomy method with NaOH shows that effectiveness of these approaches are similar. It seems that quite short operation and recovery times in the chemical matricectomy are the main advantage of the method.

摘要

嵌甲是皮肤科门诊中常见的问题。本研究旨在比较楔形切除术和氢氧化钠化学拔甲术在手术时间、术后疼痛严重程度、术后引流、复发率、恢复时间以及这两种方法对皮肤病生活质量指数的影响。本研究纳入了 60 名患者。30 名患者的约 42 个甲缘采用氢氧化钠进行化学拔甲治疗,30 名患者的 33 个甲缘行楔形切除术。化学拔甲和楔形切除术的平均手术时间分别为 7.66±3.65 分钟和 19.25±5.54 分钟(p<0.001)。化学拔甲的平均恢复时间为 17.27±14.22 天,楔形切除术的平均恢复时间为 28.85±17.03 天(p=0.004)。化学拔甲治疗的 5.4%甲缘和楔形切除术治疗的 3.6%甲缘检测到复发(p=1.000)。楔形切除术与氢氧化钠化学拔甲术的复发率无差异表明这两种方法的疗效相似。化学拔甲的主要优点似乎是手术和恢复时间较短。

相似文献

1
The treatment of ingrown nail: Chemical matricectomy with NAOH versus wedge resection.嵌甲的治疗:NAOH 化学甲床切除术与楔形切除术。
Dermatol Ther. 2018 Sep;31(5):e12677. doi: 10.1111/dth.12677. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Exploring postoperative outcomes for ingrown toenails. NaOH vs wedge resection techniques.探讨嵌甲的术后结果。NaOH 与楔形切除术的比较。
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Mar;40(3):281-7. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12427. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
3
Chemical matricectomy with sodium hydroxide: long-term follow-up results.化学性角质切除术联合氢氧化钠:长期随访结果。
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1221-4. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000136.
4
Matricectomy and nail ablation.基质切除术和指甲切除
Hand Clin. 2002 Nov;18(4):693-6, viii; discussion 697. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0712(02)00038-0.
5
The Effectiveness of Matrix Cauterization With Bichloracetic Acid in the Treatment of Ingrown Toenails.二氯乙酸基质烧灼术治疗嵌甲的有效性
Dermatol Surg. 2017 May;43(5):728-733. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000696.
6
Onychocryptosis: a long-term retrospective and comparative follow-up study of surgical and phenol chemical matricectomy in 520 procedures.嵌甲症:一项对520例手术及苯酚化学甲床切除术的长期回顾性比较随访研究。
Int J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;56(2):221-224. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13406. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Phenol chemical matricectomy is less painful, with shorter recovery times but higher recurrence rates, than surgical matricectomy: a patient's view.苯酚化学性角质切除术比手术性角质切除术疼痛程度更低、恢复时间更短,但复发率更高:患者观点。
Dermatol Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01625.x. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
8
Partial matricectomy with cryotherapy in treatment of ingrown toenails.部分甲床切除术联合冷冻疗法治疗嵌甲
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(3):262-8. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0117.
9
Controlled trial comparing the efficacy of 88% phenol versus 10% sodium hydroxide for chemical matricectomy in the management of ingrown toenail.比较88%苯酚与10%氢氧化钠用于化学甲床切除术治疗嵌甲疗效的对照试验。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2015 Sep-Oct;81(5):472-7. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.163787.
10
Comparison of Chemical Matricectomy with Trichloroacetic Acid, Phenol, or Sodium Hydroxide for Ingrown Toenails: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.化学性甲床切除术与三氯乙酸、苯酚或氢氧化钠治疗嵌甲的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Feb 27;100(4):adv00065. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3379.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of surgical treatments for ingrown toenails part II: healing time, post-operative complications, pain, and participant satisfaction.一项针对嵌甲手术治疗的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析 第二部分:愈合时间、术后并发症、疼痛和患者满意度。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Sep 6;16(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00655-7.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on surgical treatments for ingrown toenails part I: recurrence and relief of symptoms.一项针对嵌甲手术治疗的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析 第一部分:复发和症状缓解。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jun 10;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00631-1.
3
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment for Onychocryptosis: A Systematic Review.
患者对嵌甲治疗的满意度:一项系统评价。
Skin Appendage Disord. 2020 Sep;6(5):272-279. doi: 10.1159/000508927. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
4
The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.嵌甲的治疗:苯酚化学甲床切除术与美学重建。一项单盲随机临床试验。
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):845. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030845.