Suppr超能文献

苯酚化学性角质切除术比手术性角质切除术疼痛程度更低、恢复时间更短,但复发率更高:患者观点。

Phenol chemical matricectomy is less painful, with shorter recovery times but higher recurrence rates, than surgical matricectomy: a patient's view.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen City Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01625.x. Epub 2010 Jun 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ingrown toenails have a tendency for recurrence. Operative interventions can be successful, and several procedures are in use.

OBJECTIVE

Retrospective evaluation, to reveal differences in postoperative pain, time to recovery, and satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome in patients treated with a phenol (PCM) or surgical matricectomy (SM).

MATERIALS & METHODS: All matricectomy patients at the Dermatology Department of the Ludwigshafen City Hospital between 2004 and 2008 were interviewed over the telephone. Of 72 evaluable patients with a total of 112 ingrown nail sides, 33 were treated with PCM and 39 with SM. The patient group consisted of 40.3% women, the median age was 31.

RESULTS

Patients after PCM indicated two points less postoperative pain on an analogue scale from 0 to 10 (p<.001). In the PCM group, more patients recovered from the operation in less than 1 week (p=.007). Patient evaluation of cosmetic outcome was not different between the groups (p=.76), but recurrence rates were significantly higher in the PCM group (31.5%, vs 6.9% in the SM group, p=.006)

CONCLUSION

Both matricectomies have advantages and disadvantages. We should discuss these issues with our patients to help them decide on the kind of matricectomy.

摘要

背景

嵌甲容易复发。手术干预可以取得成功,目前有多种手术方法。

目的

回顾性评估苯酚(PCM)或外科切除术(SM)治疗后患者的术后疼痛、恢复时间和对美容效果满意度的差异。

材料和方法

2004 年至 2008 年期间,皮肤科对路德维希港城市医院所有接受甲床切除术的患者进行电话采访。在 72 例可评估的 112 侧嵌甲患者中,33 例采用 PCM 治疗,39 例采用 SM 治疗。患者组中女性占 40.3%,中位年龄为 31 岁。

结果

PCM 组患者术后疼痛程度在 0 到 10 的模拟量表上评分低 2 分(p<.001)。在 PCM 组中,更多患者在不到 1 周的时间内从手术中恢复(p=.007)。两组患者对美容效果的评估无差异(p=.76),但 PCM 组的复发率明显更高(31.5%,SM 组为 6.9%,p=.006)。

结论

两种甲床切除术各有优缺点。我们应该与患者讨论这些问题,以帮助他们决定采用哪种甲床切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验