Park Hye Yoon, Bang Minji, Kim Kyung Ran, Lee Eun, An Suk Kyoon
Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Section of Self, Affect and Neuroscience, Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Aug;15(8):796-804. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.05.08. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
Biased attribution styles of assigning hostile intention to innocent others and placing the blame were found in schizophrenia. Attribution styles in individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, however, have been less studied especially for its association with various psychological factors. We investigated whether UHR individuals show increased hostility perception and blaming bias and explored the associations of these biased styles of attribution with the factor structure of multifaceted self-related psychological variables and neurocognitive performances.
Fifty-four UHR individuals and 80 healthy controls were assessed by evaluating resilience, self-perception, self-esteem, and aberrant subjective experiences of schizotypy (physical anhedonia, social anhedonia, magical ideation, and perceptual aberration), basic symptoms, and carrying out a comprehensive neurocognitive test battery. Attribution styles were assessed using the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire.
UHR individuals, compared with normal controls, showed increased hostility perception and blaming bias. Factor analysis of self-related psychological variables and neurocognitive performances in the entire subject population showed a three-factor solution, which was designated as reflective self, pre-reflective self, and neurocognition. Multiple regression analysis in UHR individuals revealed that hostility perception bias was associated with reflective self and composite blame bias was associated with reflective and pre-reflective self.
This study supports the emergence of attribution biases in the putative 'prodromal' phase of schizophrenia. The associations of biased attribution styles with multifaceted self-related psychological constructs suggest that psychosocial interventions for biased attribution styles in UHR individuals should focus not only on reflective self but also pre-reflective self-related psychological constructs.
在精神分裂症患者中发现了将敌意意图归因于无辜他人并归咎于他人的偏差归因方式。然而,对于精神病超高风险(UHR)个体的归因方式,尤其是其与各种心理因素的关联,研究较少。我们调查了UHR个体是否表现出更高的敌意感知和归咎偏差,并探讨了这些偏差归因方式与多方面自我相关心理变量的因素结构和神经认知表现之间的关联。
通过评估心理韧性、自我认知、自尊以及精神分裂症样症状(身体快感缺失、社交快感缺失、奇幻思维和感知异常)、基本症状,并进行全面的神经认知测试电池,对54名UHR个体和80名健康对照进行评估。使用模糊意图敌意问卷评估归因方式。
与正常对照相比,UHR个体表现出更高的敌意感知和归咎偏差。对整个研究对象群体的自我相关心理变量和神经认知表现进行因素分析,得出一个三因素解决方案,分别命名为反思性自我、前反思性自我和神经认知。对UHR个体进行的多元回归分析显示,敌意感知偏差与反思性自我相关,综合归咎偏差与反思性自我和前反思性自我相关。
本研究支持在精神分裂症假定的“前驱”阶段出现归因偏差。偏差归因方式与多方面自我相关心理结构之间的关联表明,针对UHR个体偏差归因方式的心理社会干预不仅应关注反思性自我,还应关注前反思性自我相关的心理结构。